Re: WBC and one state's response

Pete Dashwood wrote:
> I reckon the approach would be to ask this family (nicely) to cease and
> desist. If they didn't, offer them a choice:
>
> a. Beheading.
> b. Submersion three times by the tide.
> c. Hanging, drawing and quartering.
> d. Shut the XXXX up.
>
> I suspect that 'd' would be the elected option. If it wasn't, and they wan
t
> to be martyrs, martyr them. The world would be a better place without this
> lot.
>
> It's not that I'm vindictive or bloodthirsty, it's not that I don't think
> they have a right to their opinion, or even to voice it.

Whoa!, I thought that you were the guy who thought that passing laws
made criminals out of people and that one should not punish said
aberrants?

In the UK, the death sentence would only be passed for offences of
treason where there was a serious attempt at killing HM QE2 or the PM.

Back to Bill's URL. If the WBC believe that dead US soldiers is God's
punishment for supporting gay rights then, when some mourner takes
offence and goes postal, that will be God's way of telling the WBC to
shut up?


>
> I just can't abide bad manners...
>
> Pete.
>
>
>
>
>