Re: Religion (WAS: Making money from Java)

"Chuck Stevens" <charles.stevens@unisys.com> wrote in message
news:dnsoh9$1gr0$1@si05.rsvl.unisys.com...
>
> "Oliver Wong" <owong@castortech.com> wrote in message
> news:n2lof.1789$lv3.1049@clgrps12... 
>
> I have no problem with any*one* posting in this forum.  I'm not convinced,
> though, that it's the *environment* that's hostile when cases in which
> matters of theological opinion are treated as matters of observable fact,
> and disagreements on a select group of specific points result in
> predictions of an eternity in flaming sulfur unless one party abandons his
> opinion or even heritage altogether.

I've been seeing a few posts that have been attacking Judson directly
rather than attacking his arguments.

Also, some parts of this thread looks like it might eventually start
using the "Ad Hominem Tu Quoque" fallacy:

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fall...-tu-quoque.html

i.e.
(1) At some point in this thread, Judson said something which is logically
false.
(2) Therefore, all claims Judson makes are logically false.

Which is of course, not true.

- Oliver