"Compaq FORTRAN ver. 7.0" misprint?

This link mentions a Compaq version of Fortran for Windows that I have
never heard of:

http://www.opticalres.com/cv/cvhw_f.html

Is it a misprint, or do they really mean Intel or does it really exist?

Al Greynolds

awgreynolds@earthlink.net wrote:
> This link mentions a Compaq version of Fortran for Windows that I have
> never heard of:
>
> http://www.opticalres.com/cv/cvhw_f.html
>
> Is it a misprint, or do they really mean Intel or does it really exist?
>
> Al Greynolds
>
Probably Intel Fortran version 7 or later...

--

Gary Scott
mailto:garyscott@ev1.net

Fortran Library:  http://www.fortranlib.com

Support the Original G95 Project:  http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project:  http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html

Why are there two?  God only knows.


If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows
it can't be done.

-- Henry Ford

Gary L. Scott wrote:
> awgreynolds@earthlink.net wrote: 
> Probably Intel Fortran version 7 or later...

So why is Microsoft Visual C/C++ Version 5 listed? (I've never heard of
5, just 4 and 6.)

e p chandler wrote:

> Gary L. Scott wrote:
> 
>
>
> So why is Microsoft Visual C/C++ Version 5 listed? (I've never heard of
> 5, just 4 and 6.)
>
I'm not sure...a google search on MSVC version 5 turns up lots of hits
though.

--

Gary Scott
mailto:garyscott@ev1.net

Fortran Library:  http://www.fortranlib.com

Support the Original G95 Project:  http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project:  http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html

Why are there two?  God only knows.


If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows
it can't be done.

-- Henry Ford