Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.Following up on the recent thread about c versus Fortran, speed, efficiency, etc, someone mentioned that there is no equivalent of MS Visual Studio to use in compiling Fortran dll's under Windows. I use Linux, so I would have no idea whether this is true or not, but I would really doubt it. Is there an equivalent of MS Visual Studio for Windows/Fortran? Thanks, Randy
Post Follow-up to this messageOn Tue, 31 May 2005 08:41:06 -0700, Randall Mackie <rlmackie862@yahoo.com> wrote: >Following up on the recent thread about c versus Fortran, speed, >efficiency, etc, someone mentioned that there is no equivalent of >MS Visual Studio to use in compiling Fortran dll's under Windows. >I use Linux, so I would have no idea whether this is true or >not, but I would really doubt it. Is there an equivalent of >MS Visual Studio for Windows/Fortran? Whoever mentioned that is mistaken. If you're looking for a Fortran compile r that works in the current Microsoft Visual Studio.NET, Intel Visual Fortran is one and Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran is another. There are other compiler vendors, including Absoft, which provide their own IDE. The old Compaq Visual Fortra n worked with the older Visual Studio '98. Steve Lionel Software Products Division Intel Corporation Nashua, NH User communities for Intel Software Development Products http://softwareforums.intel.com/ Intel Fortran Support http://developer.intel.com/software/products/support/
Post Follow-up to this messageRandall Mackie wrote: > > Following up on the recent thread about c versus Fortran, speed, > efficiency, etc, someone mentioned that there is no equivalent of > MS Visual Studio to use in compiling Fortran dll's under Windows. One exception might be under a "dos" window - a sngl command, > df /dll *.for creates a dll containing all .for files in the working dir. VS is not out of the loop completely - that's where you cut & paste "dllexport" directives to files that need them.
Post Follow-up to this message"Steve Lionel" <Steve.Lionel@REMOVEintelME.com> wrote in message news:ma6p91pnk7u6ee5sgc6ha58gh8n9pvgjed@ 4ax.com... > On Tue, 31 May 2005 08:41:06 -0700, Randall Mackie <rlmackie862@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Whoever mentioned that is mistaken. If you're looking for a Fortran compiler > that works in the current Microsoft Visual Studio.NET, Intel Visual Fortran is > one and Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran is another. There are other compiler vendors, > including Absoft, which provide their own IDE. The old Compaq Visual Fortran > worked with the older Visual Studio '98. The 'old' CVF remains far more popular than the wanabe IVF. Besides IVF is a .NET imposter unlike Lahey/Fujitsu and Salford Fortran .NET. -- You're Welcome, Gerry T. ______ "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." -- Homer Simpson.
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.