Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.> Please supply URL's. A top-level search at http://www.gnu.org/ > gives 9 hits for "gfortran". A top-level search on "g95" returns > 2 hits, where one is clearly a typo in the gfortran documentation > and the other simply notes that the NIST test suite can be parsed > by g95 (again probably a typo). > > Okay, I guess my false impression arose because of a few things: - The announcement of the GNU compiler collection version 4.0 mentioned Fortran 95 but not much more (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html) I cite the text: A new Fortran front end has replaced the aging GNU Fortran 77 front end. The new front end supports Fortran 90 and Fortran 95. It may not yet be as stable as the old Fortran front end. The link to the Fortran 95 home page (http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/) talks mainly of the language and when you really look for it it says that the compiler is called "gfortran". - http://www.heise.de/newsticker/resu...Fo rtran (German text) does not mention the "name" of the Fortran compiler but frequently refers to the "Fortran 95 compiler" - I have seen more references to "g95" than to "gfortran" (but perhaps foremost from people only casually involved in Fortran programming) Well, at least this discussion has solved one particular mystery for me ;) Regards, Arjen
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.