Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.www.ittopinterviewquestions.com Found some good material on software testing and CMMI
Post Follow-up to this messageOn Sun, 29 May 2005 symbianstuff@yahoo.com wrote: > www.ittopinterviewquestions.com > Found some good material on software testing and CMMI Buyer beware. I looked at some of the interview questions for testing. The answers are vague or wrong. I've interview people who prepared using stuff like this. I'd ask them something, they'd give the answer from the web site, I'd ask them to elaborate, they'd say something completely wrong or just look at me without a clue what to say. Examples of wrong answers can be found in the first few pages. For example, Ad Hoc Testing. First, adhoc is a single word (attention to detail is important). Second, adhoc testing is not monkey testing. Adhoc testing is conducted by someone using experience to guide random testing. Monkey testing is just trying random tests without any basis in experience. For example, hold the SHIFT-ALT-CTRL keys, press Scroll lock twice, let go and click some static text on the current dialog. This is a monkey test. Nothing in all my experience leads me to believe this will find a defect. Holding the CTRL key while I right click on a part of the screen that normally displays a context menu would be adhoc testing. Sometimes it gives a different or unexpected result. Once I saw it give me access to an undocumented feature the programmer used to debug the application. Too easy to find. Another bad example: Beta testing. You can beta test the first release of a product. It does not need to be a re-release. I can hire people to beta test my product. I could pick potential customers and have them beta testing version 0.9 of my product. I skipped ahead and found the definition of monkey testing (since adhoc testing referred to monkey testing). Monkey testing is not "just few tests here and there to ensure the system or an application does not crash out." This would be more suitably called smoke testing. I found it a good start but you really want to question all the answer. Take the questions and search for your own answer rather than rely on the answers given. -- Send e-mail to: darrell dot grainger at utoronto dot ca
Post Follow-up to this message
Show a Printable Version
Email This Page to Someone!
Receive updates to this thread
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.