Code Comments

Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.
For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines | New: Database administration forum
Registration is free! Edit your profileCalendarFind other membersFrequently Asked QuestionsSearch -> 
Post New Thread











Thread
Author

www.ittopinterviewquestions.com
www.ittopinterviewquestions.com
Found some good material on software testing and CMMI


Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
symbianstuff@yahoo.com
05-29-05 08:58 PM


Re: www.ittopinterviewquestions.com
On Sun, 29 May 2005 symbianstuff@yahoo.com wrote:

> www.ittopinterviewquestions.com
> Found some good material on software testing and CMMI

Buyer beware. I looked at some of the interview questions for testing. The
answers are vague or wrong. I've interview people who prepared using stuff
like this. I'd ask them something, they'd give the answer from the web
site, I'd ask them to elaborate, they'd say something completely wrong or
just look at me without a clue what to say.

Examples of wrong answers can be found in the first few pages. For
example, Ad Hoc Testing. First, adhoc is a single word (attention to
detail is important). Second, adhoc testing is not monkey testing. Adhoc
testing is conducted by someone using experience to guide random testing.
Monkey testing is just trying random tests without any basis in
experience. For example, hold the SHIFT-ALT-CTRL keys, press Scroll lock
twice, let go and click some static text on the current dialog. This is a
monkey test. Nothing in all my experience leads me to believe this will
find a defect.

Holding the CTRL key while I right click on a part of the screen that
normally displays a context menu would be adhoc testing. Sometimes it
gives a different or unexpected result. Once I saw it give me access to an
undocumented feature the programmer used to debug the application. Too
easy to find.

Another bad example: Beta testing. You can beta test the first release of
a product. It does not need to be a re-release. I can hire people to beta
test my product. I could pick potential customers and have them beta
testing version 0.9 of my product.

I skipped ahead and found the definition of monkey testing (since adhoc
testing referred to monkey testing). Monkey testing is not "just few tests
here and there to ensure the system or an application does not crash out."
This would be more suitably called smoke testing.

I found it a good start but you really want to question all the answer.
Take the questions and search for your own answer rather than rely on the
answers given.

--
Send e-mail to: darrell dot grainger at utoronto dot ca


Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
.
05-31-05 01:59 AM


Sponsored Links




Last Thread Next Thread Next
Search this forum -> 
Post New Thread

Software Testing archive

Show a Printable Version Send to friend Email This Page to Someone! subscribe to this thread Receive updates to this thread
Computer Consultants
Programming Jobs
Visual Basic Controls
SQL Server Programming
Webservices
Java Security
Visual Studio
C# Programming
Visual J++
Software engineering
Open source Software
Perl Programming
PHP Programming
ASP Programming
ASP .NET Programming
Visual Basic Programming
Windows Scripting Host
Java Programming
Java Help
Java Beans
VBScript
Cobol
MAC Applications
Unix Programming
Forum Jump:
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:34 PM.

 
Free MCSE Braindumps | Real Estate Topics

Programming forum archive

Copyrights CodeComments.com 2004 - 2006

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.