Code Comments

Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.
For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines | New: Database administration forum
Registration is free! Edit your profileCalendarFind other membersFrequently Asked QuestionsSearch -> 
Post New Thread











Thread
Author

Fixed-Size JPEG2000
Hi,
In the JPEG2000 requirements and Profiles documents, it is mentioned
that it also supports fixed size/limited workspace memory. I could not
find any documents descirbing the details about it. Can someone refer
to some reading material (web or printed) or explain how it can be
achieved?
Regards,
Sharjeel Saeed


Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Sharjeel
05-16-05 08:55 AM


Re: Fixed-Size JPEG2000
The JPEG2000 image coder generates a distortion scalable coded bit-stream
that can be truncated into any size. Please refer to Taubman's book
"Jpeg2000: Image Compression Fundamentals, Standards, and Practice".
"Sharjeel" <sharjeel.saeed@gmail.com> ????
news:1116205344.784279.114810@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hi,
>    In the JPEG2000 requirements and Profiles documents, it is mentioned
> that it also supports fixed size/limited workspace memory. I could not
> find any documents descirbing the details about it. Can someone refer
> to some reading material (web or printed) or explain how it can be
> achieved?
>  Regards,
>  Sharjeel Saeed
>



Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Gui Xie
05-16-05 08:55 AM


Re: Fixed-Size JPEG2000
Hi,

>    In the JPEG2000 requirements and Profiles documents, it is mentioned
> that it also supports fixed size/limited workspace memory. I could not
> find any documents descirbing the details about it. Can someone refer
> to some reading material (web or printed) or explain how it can be
> achieved?

The basic idea is that you only encode a limited amount of data from
each codeblock. Thus, you build a wavelet transformer that performs
data transformation on the fly, push data into codeblocks and
encode up to a maximum output size for each codeblock, then write out
the data as soon as it is encoded. Since your backend now delivers
data as it is encoded, you need to define codestream parameters such
that the order of encoding fits well to the order in which codeblocks
have to appear in the output stream. For most encoder architectures,
this would be a progression order with "position" as "slowest variable".

In a typical application, you would then only need to buffer:
a) The wavelet overlap, i.e. the lenght of the support of the
wavelet filter, in lines.
b) Enough lines to build up one line of codeblocks.
c) One codeblock plus states for the EBCOT coder.
d) Output memory for the EBCOT. You can also limit this because
you can truncate the EBCOT output due to the "embedded" nature of
the code.

So long,
Thomas







Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Thomas Richter
05-17-05 01:55 PM


Sponsored Links




Last Thread Next Thread Next
Search this forum -> 
Post New Thread

Compression archive

Show a Printable Version Send to friend Email This Page to Someone! subscribe to this thread Receive updates to this thread
Computer Consultants
Programming Jobs
Visual Basic Controls
SQL Server Programming
Webservices
Java Security
Visual Studio
C# Programming
Visual J++
Software engineering
Open source Software
Perl Programming
PHP Programming
ASP Programming
ASP .NET Programming
Visual Basic Programming
Windows Scripting Host
Java Programming
Java Help
Java Beans
VBScript
Cobol
MAC Applications
Unix Programming
Forum Jump:
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 AM.

 
Free MCSE Braindumps | Real Estate Topics

Programming forum archive

Copyrights CodeComments.com 2004 - 2006

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.