Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.William M. Klein wrote: > "Robert Wagner" <spamblocker-robert@wagner.net> wrote in message > news:p07d11hesal31g60b1pfjbv6ap5fvfd8l5@ 4ax.com... > > > <snip> > > > > Robert, > It is time to reminde you to use "in my opinion" when you are expressing > something that is HARDLY proven and probably (to the best of my knowledge) even > "common consensus".. > > There are many reasons that OO COBOL hasn't (yet) caught on - on (IBM) > mainframes. Not the least of which is (IMHO) lack of *any* "buiseness" or iented > (vendor) class libraries (for COBOL, PL/I C++, Java or ANY language availa ble > for IBM mainframes) > Good point. As another former Micro Focus employee said some two/three years ago - he didn't have much hope for a language which didn't have a support class library. Yes, M/F does, and to a "slightly" lesser extent, so does F/J. (Possibly Hitachi as well - still as my Japanese is probably no better than yours - I just don't know :-) ). However based on your comments at other times - ".....vendors getting burned on gambling and introducing features before J4 has arrived at a Standard", only to find their features are partially negated by the eventual J4 specifications - small wonder that there aren't 'common classes' available. Even given J4's target date for the 'basics' on collections as being 2006 (????) - still got to wait for individual vendors to pick up on the spec and implement. (As yet, haven't heard a dicky bird about anybody implementing the 'Finalizer' TR). Those vendors with no current implementation of OO will probably give the feature a miss. If anything much more likely they would implement 'Dynamic Tables' when the TR comes to fruition - and even then, probably likely a year or more after its official publication. One thought though with regard to IBM - their OO is structured to pull in all features available from Java, with Java controlling creation and destruction of objects. Is it likely IBM would introduce say IBM COBOL collections running in tandem with the set provided by using Java. Jimmy
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.