Re: Right way of using setkey(3) and encrypt(3)

cnystrom@gmail.com wrote:
> Wayne C. Morris wrote:
> 
>
> Here is my solution. Comments welcome.
>
> I suppose the next step is to come up with some code that packs
> strings into 8 byte chuncks and back for encryption processing.

No, the next (long overdue) step is to remove the OT cross-posting
to c.l.c.  F'ups set.

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer@yahoo.com) (cbfalconer@worldnet.att.net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!