Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.I thought so, Lueko. But hesitate to commit myself here on things so "new". <G> Warren Lueko Willms wrote: > . On 22.11.04 > wrote wsimmons5@optonline.net (Warren Simmons) > on /COMP/LANG/COBOL > in Hfaod.31854$hc5.19260383@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net > about Re: COBOL COPYBOOK CONVERTER > > > WS> In reply to the question at the end, > > moved up here: > > LW>> BTW, it is the compiler which should provide the cross- > LW>> reference listing. > > WS> does the compiler have all the information? > > For the compilation unit which it is working on, it should have. > Otherwise the compiler could not generate correct code. > > On the other hand, a cross-reference generator for a whole set of > COBOL programs should be able to parse COBOL syntax _completely._ > > > > Quoted from previous messages: > > > > > > > > Yours, > Lüko Willms http://www.willms-edv.de > /--------- L.WILLMS@jpberlin.de -- Alle Rechte vorbehalten -- > > Der Satz muß noch mit einem Bruch multipliziert werden. -G.C.Lichtenberg
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.