[QA-Action] Re: HTML_CSS-0.3.5 (beta) Pulled back.

Hi!

This release has been pulled back because auf a wrong version name.
Please review the version naming conventions [1] and re-release it using
a correct version name.

Thanks for your appreciation.
--
Tobias Schlitt                                   GPG Key: 0xA6529579
a passion for php                            http://www.schlitt.info
Like to say "thank you"?    -  http://pear.php.net/wishlist.php/toby

Hi Lukas Smith!
On 11/21/2004 04:07 PM you wrote:

I'm moving this over to pear-qa completly, because it's more a QA issue,
than something in personal with Klaus ans Laurent.
 
 
 
 

> well beyond that you should also increase the minor version number for
> feature additions ..

> so it should be 0.4.0beta1 if at all

> generally we have been very lax regarding the version state thing due to
> everybody thinking that alan's rfc is actually the way to go ..

> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=65

Yeah, of course we were and of course the proposal will be the way to go
some times, but I think it's the way for QA to make people follow the
actual standards. That's why I announce some time ago: "When I see a
wrong version number in time, next time, I will feel free to delete the
specific release, to have this regulation working, finally." [1]. Sorry
for not being able to keep this promise until now for timing reasons.

Regards,
Toby
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pea...76231009710&w=2
--
Tobias Schlitt                                   GPG Key: 0xA6529579
a passion for php                            http://www.schlitt.info
Like to say "thank you"?    -  http://pear.php.net/wishlist.php/toby

Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> Hi Lukas Smith!
> On 11/21/2004 04:07 PM you wrote:
>
> I'm moving this over to pear-qa completly, because it's more a QA issue,
> than something in personal with Klaus ans Laurent.
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
> Yeah, of course we were and of course the proposal will be the way to go
> some times, but I think it's the way for QA to make people follow the
> actual standards. That's why I announce some time ago: "When I see a
> wrong version number in time, next time, I will feel free to delete the
> specific release, to have this regulation working, finally." [1]. Sorry
> for not being able to keep this promise until now for timing reasons.
>
> Regards,
> Toby
> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pea...76231009710&w=2

Hi Tobias,

Nothing personal, with you and even with Greg, but when you said

"When I see a wrong version number in time, next time, I will feel free
to delete the specific release, to have this regulation working, finally."

So, why don't you do the same with PEAR 1.3.3.1
I think the core class should give a good example too ;-)

Nevermind, i'll republish the package under 0.4.0 version in few minutes.

Laurent

Hi Laurent Laville!
On 11/21/2004 04:45 PM you wrote:
> Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> 

> "When I see a wrong version number in time, next time, I will feel free
> to delete the specific release, to have this regulation working, finally."
>
> So, why don't you do the same with PEAR 1.3.3.1
> I think the core class should give a good example too ;-)
>
> Nevermind, i'll republish the package under 0.4.0 version in few minutes.

Agreed, as I said: I was not able to keep the promise in the past. But
now I will be. If next time PEAR 1.3.3.2 follows, I will delete that,
too. :)

Regards,
Toby
--
Tobias Schlitt                                   GPG Key: 0xA6529579
a passion for php                            http://www.schlitt.info
Like to say "thank you"?    -  http://pear.php.net/wishlist.php/toby