Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.In article <20041117174701.55c5c308.d.a.ham@citg.tudelft.nl>, David Ham <d.a.ham@citg.tudelft.nl> writes: > For starters, the processor (ie the thing processing the fortran source) > isn't required to be a compiler at all. It has been frequently pointed > out that it would be completely legal to make a Fortran interpreter. Right. The physicist Richard Feynman described a "compiler" at Los Alamos during WWII which consisted of people passing cards to each other, making calculations, noting results on them and passing them on.
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.