Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits

In article <cnd447$bee$1@peabody.colorado.edu>,
"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote:

> On 16-Nov-2004, Joe Zitzelberger <joe_zitzelberger@nospam.com> wrote:
> 
>
> I've used a macro-assembler that looked just like BASIC.    I see no real
> problem in having a macro-assembler that did this.  (Haven't seen one though)[/col
or]

What if "some-sub-routine" doesn't properly finish until point Y?  How
is it save to demand an exit at X?

The entire point of subroutines is that they are usable from more than a
single place -- to make the caller intimately aware of the subroutines
exit is to void that benefit.