nightingale

<tholen@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:kbdhd.30550$jo2.4631@twister.socal.rr.com...

The cat came back...

> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
>
> 220> when will you stop depressing the newsgroups, bruce?
>
> 221> what is all this shit, bruce?
>
> 222> is that right, bruce?
>
> 223> are you a kook, bruce?
>
> 224> so how long have you been a kook, bruce?
>
> 225> LOL!!!!!! You don't know shit do you, bruce?
>
> 226> you just don't measure up do you, bruce?
>
> 226> what is this crap, bruce?
>
> 226> pull the other one, bruce.
>
> 226> no time to lose, bruce.
>
> 226> are you sure, bruce?
>
> What do all your questions to yourself have to do with classical music,
> Bruce?
>

About as much as your digest, kooky.

>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred]
>
> Nicolai P. Zwar writes:
>
> 433> Dr. David Tholen cared to share with us all:
>
> Where did the referenced item say anything about a "Dr. David Tholen",
> Zwar?[/color]

We all know who tholen@antispam.ham is, kooky.

>
> 433> What tools do you use to compile your digest, Dave? Do you use a
> 433> spreadsheet software?
>
> What do your questions have to do with classical music, Zwar?

About as much as your digest, kooky.

>
>    "I don't feel the need to rationalize my own odd behavior.
>    I just accept it my own odd behavior as odd behavior."
>       --Nicolai P. Zwar
>
>    "I'm just being an eccentric oddball, Dave."
>       --Nicolai P. Zwar
>
>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred]
>
> Risto Karttunen writes:
>
> 138> I have this impression, based on some distinguishing characteristics
> 138> (size, shape, even color). In fact, this impression has some
> 138> resemblance to the aesthetic feeling which classical music
> 138> occasionally gives to me, Wagner's operas for example.
>
> Classic illogic.
>
> 138> You mean your ever-recurring question "what does that have to do with
> 138> classical music, X"? (X being a name). If that is the case, you seem
> 138> to say that your digests are relevant and justified, since you use[/color]
the
> 138> words "classical music" in them, without saying anything *about*
> 138> classical music. Am I correct?
>
> Well, it wouldn't make sense to ask what your questions have to do with
> classical music in a newsgroup about Karl Malden's nose, now would it,
> Karttunen?
>

LOL!  They have newsgroups for the strangest things.

>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred]
>
> grantco writes:
>
> 1778> And yet even more evasion from Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> And yet even more evasion from Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> And yet even more evasion from Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> And yet even more evasion from Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> And yet even more evasion from Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> And yet even more evasion from Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> And yet even more evasion from Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> Given that your post did not appear at rec.music.classical I haven't
> 1778> seen it, Tholen.
>
> The previous postings of mine also did not appear at rec.music.classical,
> grantco, yet that didn't stop your from seeing them.
>
> 1778> Why don't you tell me where it is?
>
> Still having trouble figuring out how to use google, grantco?
>
> 1778> Beside you continue to forget that you wrote:
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1778> And yet once again you are discussing it.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1778> Perhaps if you didn't
> 1778> dishonestly remove it this time you would better remember it,[/color]
Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1778> You brought it up, Hypocrite.
>
> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco?  Still having attribution problems?
>
> 1778> Why did you bring up a post you wrote to
> 1778> me in another newsgroup, Tholen?
>
> Still having memory problems, grantco?  You're the one who brought up
> the erroneous allegation of a retreat.
>
> 1778> Especially when it obviously had
> 1778> nothing to do with classical music, Hypocrite?
>
> Responding to yourself again, grantco?
>
> 1778> Once again more removal. Such dishonesty on your part Tholen.
> 1778> I'm ashamed for you.
>
> What does your unsubstantiated and erroneous claim of dishonesty have
> to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1778> You evasion is yet AGAIN noted, Liar.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> More removal by Tholen of his lies.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing the existence of some lies on my
> part, grantco.
>
> 1778> Typical.
>
> Stating the truth is typical for me, grantco.
>
> 1778> You evasion is yet AGAIN noted, Liar.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> You removed your quote I provided. You continue to discuss posts
which
> 1778> have nothing to do with classical music like this you wrote above:
>
> Ah, so you admit that your postings to this newsgroup have nothing to
> do with classical music, eh grantco?  Tell me, why do you continue to
> post there here, grantco?
>
> 1778> Which part of your response quoted above was about classical music,
> 1778> HYPOCRITE???
>
> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco?  Still having attribution problems?
>
> 1778> My claim is substantiated unless you provide evidence for which part
> 1778> of what you wrote above had ANYTHING to do with classical music.
>
> Non sequitur, given that the discussion was about the irony of your
> retreat, grantco.
>
> 1778> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>
> 1778> Its so easy yet you can't do it, can you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1778> Poor Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> 1778> He could have what he supposedly wants, yet lacks the courage to do
> 1778> it.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1778> Typical.
>
> Stating the truth is typical for me, grantco.

LOL!

>
> 1778> Its so easy yet you can't do it, can you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1778> Evidence for Tholen's hypocrisy:
>
> You're erroneously presupposing some hypocrisy on my part, grantco.
> Rather ironic, coming from a hypocrite, the evidence of which appears
> at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>
> 1778> He writes at rec.music.classical:
>
> I'm well aware of what I wrote at rec.music.classical, grantco.
>
> 1778> Yet has the audacity to question what MY post has to do with
classical
> 1778> music when obviously he ignores his own erroneous "rules of
> 1778> relevance."
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 1778> He also claimed:
>
> I'm well aware of what I claimed, grantco.
>
> 1778> Yet continues to discuss it in his statement regarding a retreat.
>
> Still suffering from memory problems, grantco?  You're the one who
> brought up the erroneous allegation of a retreat, not me.
>
> 1778> Evidence for Tholen's hypocrisy.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing some hypocrisy on my part, grantco.
> Rather ironic, coming from a hypocrite, the evidence of which appears
> at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>
> 1778> Evidence for Tholen's lies.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing some lies on my part, grantco.
> Rather ironic, coming from a liar, the evidence of which appears
> at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>
> 1778> (further evidence for Tholen's hypocrisy and lies of course is
> 1778> forthcoming when Tholen again dishonestly removes his quoted text
> 1778> above)
>
> You're erroneously presupposing some hypocrisy and lies on my part,
> grantco.  Rather ironic, coming from a hypocrite and liar, the evidence
> of which appears at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>
> 1778> Would you not continue, Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1778> Its sooooooo easy yet you can't do it, can you?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1778> Poor pathetic Dr. Tholen, the pride of astrologers everywhere.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition, coupled with an unsubstantiated and
> erroneous claim.
>
> 1778> Would you not continue, Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>
> 1779> Of course you are correct. Yet amazingly (and of course
> 1779> hypocritically) if you, I or anyone else merely added the words
> 1779> "classical music," to our post, Tholen would not consider the post
to
> 1779> be on-topic.
>
> On what basis do you speak for me, grantco?
>
> 1779> Such logic only works for trolling lying hypocrites.
>
> Which explains why you continue to use it, grantco.
>
> 1779> Luckily for Tholen he meets the criteria. :-)
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> Evidence that grantco is a fool:
>
>    "As always you erroneously assume that the foolishness
>    of these exchanges with you is not apparent to me. I
>    acknowledge the foolishness."
>       --grantco
>
>    "My threads are in the postings."
>       --grantco
>
> Evidence for grantco's hypocrisy:
>
>    "Actually I care little about a waste of bandwidth."
>       --grantco
>
>    "Just don't reply Tholen."
>       --grantco
>
>    "I've told him all he would have to do is literally ASK
>    for me not to continue and I would do it."
>       --grantco
>
> [36] Would you not continue, grantco?
>
> Above is evidence that grantco lied, given that I did ask (35 times)
> for him not to continue.
>

Perhaps a simple one-line post, without all the other crap to antagonise
grantco, saying just "Please do not continue this." might work Giving
grantco the last word might work as well. We'll never get the chance to find
out though.

>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred]
>
> Brendan R. Wehrung writes:
>
> 487> Dave has been largely absent from this group,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>[/color]

Google shows otherwise.

> 487> and not in any trollish manner when present, for quite a while.
>
> For more than "quite a while", Wehrung.  I've not been a troll at any
> time, which is more than I can say for you, Wehrung.
>

What do you call this silly digest then?

> 487> You on the other hand...
>
> What do Freud's trolls have to do with classical music, Wehrung?
>

Why don't you ask Freud?

>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred]
>
> Nightingale writes:
>
> 1795> Apparently he doesn't need to - all he needs to do is wait for your
> 1795> newest stalker to cross post it here.[/color]

For what strange value of "today" does this post belong here?  Talk about
obsession, it's unbelievable that you have to go hunting back for month old
posts to include in your antagonists digest!

>
> 1796> Why don't you just plonk him?  Unlike Tholen, Freud has never had
> 1796> anything interesting or useful to say.
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, nightingale?
>

And yet again - she's one of the few people who is still nice to you, and
you treat her like dirt. If this is how you treat people who like you, I'll
bet you don't have a friend in the world.

>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred]
>
> alias              # today     total     last year
> --------------     -------     -----     ---------
> bruce                    7       226             0
> nightingale              2       183          1613
> bisectional                      165             0
> cypherpunk                       165           578[/color]

Tied with Shorty!  I'll have to do something about that.

> grantco                  2       115           229
> greycloud                         91             0
> zwar                     1        86           349
> kohl                              84          2192
> dizzy                             82           522
> patterson                         72           135
> fields                            66           678
> chatterly                         48             0
> aratzio                           47             0
> wehrung                  1        42           262
> elizabot                          41             0
> ross                              36            10
> daniels                           34           165
> karttunen                1        33            97
> haslam                            30           675
> drpostman                         27            54
> hertz                             27             0
> lockhart                          25            60
> drysdale                          24             0
> bloggs                            21           200
> freud                             21            44
> diogenes                          20             0
> th@len                            20             0
> ah                                19             0
> chrisv                            17             0
> edwin                             15             0
> deus                              14             0
> phoenix                           14            18
> relic                             14             0
> parsnip                           13             0
> jaakko                            12            99
> kolle                             12           264
> beck                              11           239
> bostonblackie                     10             0
> penso                             10           172
> flonkenstein                       9             0
> kadaitcha                          9             0
> ranger                             9             0
> hgj                                8             0
> logical                            8             0
> "nightingale"                      8             0
> bornfeld                           6            14
> charlie                            6             0
> rickenbacker                       6             0
> prai jei                           5            11
> snit                               5             0
> yyyiiinnnggg                       5             0
> concerned                          4             0
> donna                              4             0
> extreme                            4             0
> qasim                              4             0
> hucker                             4             2
> alex                               3             0
> andrews                            3             1
> antispim.him                       3             0
> casa                               3             0
> g&p                                3             0
> invalid                            3             0
> jazz guy                           3             3
> jim                                3             0
> marty                              3             0
> sutton                             3             1
> ?ho|en                             2             0
> .                                  2             0
> ada9                               2             0
> adam                               2            13
> balaam                             2             0
> braves fan                         2             0
> deco                               2             0
> dodel                              2             0
> harrington                         2            64
> hernandez                          2             0
> js                                 2             0
> kennedy                            2             3
> marshall                           2             0
> molybdenum                         2             0
> n                                  2             0
> schultz                            2             5
> toughlin                           2             0
> tweet                              2             7
> wiser                              2             3
>                                   1             0
> afoklala                           1             0
> akhen                              1             0
> antagonismo                        1            90
> antagonist                         1             0
> blonko                             1             0
> bob                                1             1
> briggs                             1            20
> burtner                            1             0
> cargle                             1             0
> catroo                             1           108
> cohen                              1             0
> commentator                        1             0
> creevey                            1            69
> daveb                              1             0
> durante                            1             0
> emperor                            1             0
> ende                               1             0
> fischer                            1             0
> gactimus                           1             0
> gamble                             1            13
> girouard                           1             2
> god                                1             0
> gorden                             1             0
> granzeau                           1             0
> h                                  1             0
> highwood                           1            12
> homie                              1             1
> ilechko                            1             0
> koehlmann                          1             0
> lawrence                           1             1
> learned                            1             0
> liath                              1             0
> lysaght                            1             0
> martin                             1             0
> mirah                              1             0
> mitzel                             1             0
> monkey                             1             1
> muething                           1             5
> o'brien                            1             0
> o'donoghue                         1             0
> osterwald                          1             0
> ot                                 1             0
> pinups                             1             0
> ploni                              1             4
> porky                              1            16
> pragmatist                         1             0
> refutebot                          1             0
> rice                               1             0
> rick                               1             0
> roberts                            1             8
> steiner                            1             0
> stratford                          1             1
> straussvogel                       1             0
> sutton                             1             1
> tuan                               1             0
> voege                              1             0
> weinkam                            1             0
> whitney                            1             0
> --------------     -------     -----     ---------
>            144          14      2223         10033
>

Well, this is a nice bit of evidence to prove who is the real disruptive
element of the group - averages a little over one post a day in your
absence, and that's only by including old posts & posts of people who spoke
up in support of you.  Brendan & Nightingale don't belong on your
antagonists list.

"b s" <BISECTIONAL2004@YAHOO.CA> wrote in message
news:2uqcjiF2disinU1@uni-berlin.de...
>
> <tholen@antispam.ham> wrote in message
> news:kbdhd.30550$jo2.4631@twister.socal.rr.com...
>
> The cat came back...
> 
>
> About as much as your digest, kooky.
> 
>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred] 
>
> We all know who tholen@antispam.ham is, kooky.
> 
>
> About as much as your digest, kooky.
> 
>[/color]
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred] 
characteristics 
with 
seem 
> the 
>
> LOL!  They have newsgroups for the strangest things.
> 
>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred] 
haven't 
rec.music.classical, 
> Tholen? 
> which 
music, 
part 
do 
>
> LOL!
> 
> classical 
> to 
>
> Perhaps a simple one-line post, without all the other crap to antagonise
> grantco, saying just "Please do not continue this." might work Giving
> grantco the last word might work as well. We'll never get the chance to
find
> out though.
> 
>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred] 
>
> Google shows otherwise.
> 
>
> What do you call this silly digest then?
> 
>
> Why don't you ask Freud?
> 
>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred] 
your 
>
> For what strange value of "today" does this post belong here?  Talk about
> obsession, it's unbelievable that you have to go hunting back for month
old
> posts to include in your antagonists digest!
> 
>
> And yet again - she's one of the few people who is still nice to you, and
> you treat her like dirt. If this is how you treat people who like you,
I'll
> bet you don't have a friend in the world.
> 
>
 ========================================
 ===================================[colo
r=darkred] 
>
> Tied with Shorty!  I'll have to do something about that.
> 
>
> Well, this is a nice bit of evidence to prove who is the real disruptive
> element of the group - averages a little over one post a day in your
> absence, and that's only by including old posts & posts of people who
spoke
> up in support of you.  Brendan & Nightingale don't belong on your
> antagonists list.
> 

"b s" <BISECTIONAL2004@YAHOO.CA> wrote in message news:<2uqcjiF2disinU1@uni-berlin.de>...[c
olor=darkred]
> <tholen@antispam.ham> wrote in message
> news:kbdhd.30550$jo2.4631@twister.socal.rr.com...
>
> The cat came back...
> 
>
> About as much as your digest, kooky.
> 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>
> We all know who tholen@antispam.ham is, kooky.
> 
>
> About as much as your digest, kooky.
> 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>  the 
>
> LOL!  They have newsgroups for the strangest things.
> 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>  Tholen? 
>  which 
>
> LOL!
> 
>  classical 
>  to 
>
> Perhaps a simple one-line post, without all the other crap to antagonise
> grantco, saying just "Please do not continue this." might work Giving
> grantco the last word might work as well. We'll never get the chance to fi
nd
> out though.
> 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>
> Google shows otherwise.
> 
>
> What do you call this silly digest then?
> 
>
> Why don't you ask Freud?
> 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>
> For what strange value of "today" does this post belong here?  Talk about
> obsession, it's unbelievable that you have to go hunting back for month ol
d
> posts to include in your antagonists digest!
> 
>
> And yet again - she's one of the few people who is still nice to you, and
> you treat her like dirt. If this is how you treat people who like you, I'l
l
> bet you don't have a friend in the world.
> 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>
> Tied with Shorty!  I'll have to do something about that.[/color]


Like hell youz will!

> 
>
> Well, this is a nice bit of evidence to prove who is the real disruptive
> element of the group - averages a little over one post a day in your
> absence, and that's only by including old posts & posts of people who spok
e
> up in support of you.  Brendan & Nightingale don't belong on your
> antagonists list.


Youz have got it all wrong. Tholokook is the antagonist. Look at the list.
He's antagonized just about everyone here.

--
Freddie D. 'fag' Shorts

I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!

Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
Contact me by email (mailto:cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com) or mail me at
FS Newssite Inc.
101 West 23rd St. Suite 2237, New York, NY, 10011
On second thoughts, don't bother. Just sign me up for subscriptions.
I like to steal copyrighted material.

Check out my current web sites -
http://www.orwellian.org
http://www.miscstuff.org
http://home.nyc.rr.com/cypherpunk/

I'm really proud of this -
http://Frederick.Shorts.swellserver...worldrecord.php

http://www.plugger.info
http://www.pluggers.com/daily/

Hay! My kinda place - http://www.gaylordhotels.com/

Son of Kit wrote:

> "b s" <BISECTIONAL2004@YAHOO.CA> wrote in message news:<2uqcjiF2disinU1@un
i-berlin.de>...
> 

So I see - both trolls are back now.  I'm not sure why my ID ended up as
the subject of this thread though.

 
>
>
>
> Like hell youz will!
>

I've lost my top spot on the list.  Are you guys going to battle it out
with bruce?
 
>
>
>
> Youz have got it all wrong. Tholokook is the antagonist. Look at the list.
> He's antagonized just about everyone here.
>

You both have it wrong, but there is probably no point in trying to explain.


--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspire:
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.

Nightingale <sing@music.ca> wrote in message news:<2v21r6F2ggl4oU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Son of Kit wrote:
> 
>
> So I see - both trolls are back now.


Who? Youz and Tholen da kook?

> I'm not sure why my ID ended up as
> the subject of this thread though.


Beats me! Its shoulda bin Fartingale anyways.

>
> 
>
> I've lost my top spot on the list.  Are you guys going to battle it out
> with bruce?


Typical woman. Gives up as soon as the going gets tough.

> 
>
> You both have it wrong, but there is probably no point in trying to explain.[/colo
r]


Yeah, we know youz are in love wid da kook. Butt look how he treats youz
like dirt. Its obvious he's a mysogynist with latent homosexual tendancies.
His obsession wid my signature is a dead giveway. Plus the fact he's an
asstronomer.

--
Freddie D. 'fag' Shorts

I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!

Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
Contact me by email (mailto:cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com) or mail me at
FS Newssite Inc.
101 West 23rd St. Suite 2237, New York, NY, 10011
On second thoughts, don't bother. Just sign me up for subscriptions.
I like to steal copyrighted material.

Check out my current web sites -
http://www.orwellian.org
http://www.miscstuff.org
http://home.nyc.rr.com/cypherpunk/

I'm really proud of this -
http://Frederick.Shorts.swellserver...worldrecord.php

http://www.plugger.info
http://www.pluggers.com/daily/

Hay! My kinda place - http://www.gaylordhotels.com/

freddie.berkowitz.shorts@gmail.com (Son of Kit) wrote in message news:<87f4d204.0411051032.
6bf8bc5f@posting.google.com>...
> "b s" <BISECTIONAL2004@YAHOO.CA> wrote in message news:<2uqcjiF2disinU1@un
i-berlin.de>... 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>  the 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>  Tholen? 
>  which 
>  classical 
>  to 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>   ========================================
=================================
== 
>
>
> Like hell youz will!
>

Glad you agree.  Welcome back, btw.
 
>
>
> Youz have got it all wrong. Tholokook is the antagonist. Look at the list.
> He's antagonized just about everyone here.
>

Eventually it will be everyone.  His first title was the best.

> --
> Freddie D. 'fag' Shorts
>
> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
> See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!
>
> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
> Contact me by email (mailto:cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com) or mail me at
> FS Newssite Inc.
> 101 West 23rd St. Suite 2237, New York, NY, 10011
> On second thoughts, don't bother. Just sign me up for subscriptions.
> I like to steal copyrighted material.
>
> Check out my current web sites -
> http://www.orwellian.org
> http://www.miscstuff.org
> http://home.nyc.rr.com/cypherpunk/
>
> I'm really proud of this -
> http://Frederick.Shorts.swellserver...worldrecord.php
>
> http://www.plugger.info
> http://www.pluggers.com/daily/
>
> Hay! My kinda place - http://www.gaylordhotels.com/

Nightingale <sing@music.ca> wrote in message news:<2v21r6F2ggl4oU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Son of Kit wrote:
> 
>
> So I see - both trolls are back now.

Both - kooky & ???

> I'm not sure why my ID ended up as
> the subject of this thread though.
>

I know you don't read digest threads & was was hoping somebody would
quote this. (Thanks Freddie!)

> 
>
> I've lost my top spot on the list.  Are you guys going to battle it out
> with bruce?
>

You're not in the competition anymore?  You settled for second spot
last year as well.  Poor Nightingale - always the bridesmaid, never
the bride.
 
>
> You both have it wrong, but there is probably no point in trying to explain.[/colo
r]

You have it wrong, but there is probably no point in trying to
explain.  Wake up and smell the coffee, tweetie:  you keep trying to
be nice to somebody who will never appreciate it.  There must be some
decent people closer to home, so why are you chasing after some
Hawaiian kook?

>> I'm not sure why my ID ended up as 
>
>
> Beats me!

Right. I beat you to this thread.

> Its shoulda bin Fartingale anyways.
>

You're the only one who calls her that.  Why?
 
explain.
>
>
> Yeah, we know youz are in love wid da kook.

What I don't understand is why.

> Butt look how he treats youz
> like dirt.

You're not the first one to point this out.

> Its obvious he's a mysogynist with latent homosexual tendancies.
> His obsession wid my signature is a dead giveway. Plus the fact he's an
> asstronomer.

She's a bit slow.  It's kind of you to keep trying to explain,
although it's probably a lost cause.

Son of Kit wrote:
> Nightingale <sing@music.ca> wrote in message news:<2v21r6F2ggl4oU1@uni-ber
lin.de>...
> 
>
>
>
> Who? Youz and Tholen da kook?
>

You and BS.  What's with the new ID - who is Kit?

> 
>
>
>
> Beats me! Its shoulda bin Fartingale anyways.
>

LOL!  I'm sure it would have been if you had chosen the subject line.


--
The better the voyce is, the meeter it is to honour and
serve God there-with:  and the voyce of man is chiefely
to be imployed to that ende.

Omnis spiritus laudet Dominum.

-William Byrd

Nightingale <sing@music.ca> wrote in message news:<2v56j4F2htoj0U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Son of Kit wrote: 
>
> You and BS.


Whadya mean? Me and BS? What BS? Its all true.

> What's with the new ID - who is Kit?


Never you mind.

> 
>
> LOL!  I'm sure it would have been if you had chosen the subject line.

You got that right! Either that or giant, cellulite ass!

--
Freddie D. 'fag' Shorts

I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!

Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
Contact me by email (mailto:cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com) or mail me at
FS Newssite Inc.
101 West 23rd St. Suite 2237, New York, NY, 10011
On second thoughts, don't bother. Just sign me up for subscriptions.
I like to steal copyrighted material.

Check out my current web sites -
http://www.orwellian.org
http://www.miscstuff.org
http://home.nyc.rr.com/cypherpunk/

I'm really proud of this -
http://Frederick.Shorts.swellserver...worldrecord.php

http://www.plugger.info
http://www.pluggers.com/daily/

Hay! My kinda place - http://www.gaylordhotels.com/