License question

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A Tcl application I'm developing uses some GPL code, and I am releasing
it under the GPL. Most of the code I've used to learn programming is
GPL, so I'm generally comfortable with this.

I was asked by a few people, however, why I didn't release under a
BSD-style license, which is more prevalent with Tcl apps. I'm willing to
consider this, but it was my understanding that you can't take GPL code
and release it under a BSD license--even though BSD licenses are
"approved" by both OSI and the FSF. Is this understanding correct? Would
I be able to release under a BSD license only if I remove the GPL code,
or can I leave it in with no problem?


- --
Kevin Walzer, PhD
WordTech Software--Open Source Applications and Packages for OS X
http://www.wordtech-software.com
http://www.smallbizmac.com
http://www.kevin-walzer.com
mailto:sw@wordtech-software.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBe97VJmdQs+6YVcoRAugeAJ9Es/AjUzB9h07yAh3/Q3Swgzfl2QCeO/M3
a45Z138wPPz0icfJKI3/af4=
=wi1G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

You have to remove all GPL code to release it under BSD (and of course
use only BSD or compatible license). If you whant to keep the GPL code,
you must release the whole app as GLP.

George

"Kevin Walzer" <sw@wordtech-software.com> wrote in message
news:p9Red.504$b%5.432@fe37.usenetserver.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> A Tcl application I'm developing uses some GPL code, and I am releasing
> it under the GPL. Most of the code I've used to learn programming is
> GPL, so I'm generally comfortable with this.
>
> I was asked by a few people, however, why I didn't release under a
> BSD-style license, which is more prevalent with Tcl apps. I'm willing to
> consider this, but it was my understanding that you can't take GPL code
> and release it under a BSD license--even though BSD licenses are
> "approved" by both OSI and the FSF. Is this understanding correct? Would
> I be able to release under a BSD license only if I remove the GPL code,
> or can I leave it in with no problem?
>
>
> - --
> Kevin Walzer, PhD
> WordTech Software--Open Source Applications and Packages for OS X
> http://www.wordtech-software.com
> http://www.smallbizmac.com
> http://www.kevin-walzer.com
> mailto:sw@wordtech-software.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBe97VJmdQs+6YVcoRAugeAJ9Es/AjUzB9h07yAh3/Q3Swgzfl2QCeO/M3
> a45Z138wPPz0icfJKI3/af4=
> =wi1G
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

"Georgios Petasis" <petasis@iit.demokritos.gr> writes:

> You have to remove all GPL code to release it under BSD (and of course
> use only BSD or compatible license). If you whant to keep the GPL code,
> you must release the whole app as GLP.

...unless, of course, it is code that you wrote yourself, or otherwise
have the distribution rights to. Which, notwithstanding the "derived
work" issue, is logical: BSD allows things that GPL expressly forbids,
such as putting distribution restrictions on binaries, and you cannot
allow what the copyright owner has forbidden.

--
O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for the info. I think I will replace the GPL'd code--I've found
some BSD licenced code at the Tcl wiki that is just as good.



Georgios Petasis wrote:

| You have to remove all GPL code to release it under BSD (and of course
| use only BSD or compatible license). If you whant to keep the GPL code,
| you must release the whole app as GLP.
|
| George
|
| "Kevin Walzer" <sw@wordtech-software.com> wrote in message
| news:p9Red.504$b%5.432@fe37.usenetserver.com...
|
| A Tcl application I'm developing uses some GPL code, and I am releasing
| it under the GPL. Most of the code I've used to learn programming is
| GPL, so I'm generally comfortable with this.
|
| I was asked by a few people, however, why I didn't release under a
| BSD-style license, which is more prevalent with Tcl apps. I'm willing to
| consider this, but it was my understanding that you can't take GPL code
| and release it under a BSD license--even though BSD licenses are
| "approved" by both OSI and the FSF. Is this understanding correct? Would
| I be able to release under a BSD license only if I remove the GPL code,
| or can I leave it in with no problem?
|
|

- --
Kevin Walzer, PhD
WordTech Software--Open Source Applications and Packages for OS X
http://www.wordtech-software.com
http://www.smallbizmac.com
http://www.kevin-walzer.com
mailto:sw@wordtech-software.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFBfHidJmdQs+6YVcoRAv08AJ9dlMZbaX42
waTOAKUJLq56wBp16QCfUiI7
AUBcMj7SoYCLoN8sLm8k6zk=
=SKd5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----