Still wrong (was: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were

"Robert Wagner" <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote in message
 news:huufl01akmdmcnqriahmda7vue9prhd1uc@
4ax.com...
> On 27 Sep 2004 01:32:48 -0700, riplin@Azonic.co.nz (Richard) wrote:
>
<snip>
> 
>
> You're  right. Well it does produce 64-bit code for Power PC.
>

Your evidence for this is what?  As far as I know *all* VisualAge (and Cobol
Set)
COBOL's (from IBM) have USAGE POINTER data items that are 32-bit, so I assum
e
they are 32 (or 31-)BIT COBOLs.  I haven't checked this myself, but I don't 
know
of any IBM COBOL (except OS/400 - which is a different system entirely) that
 is
64-bit.


--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
soon.