Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!

tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<NMF6d.18$z04.12@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> grantco writes:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Perhaps not, grantco.
> 
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> 
> 
> 
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Note:  no response.
> 
> 
> 
>
> Glad to see you admit to being a liar, grantco.
> 
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> 
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> 
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that it is necessary to think, grantco.
> 
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> 
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> 
> 
> 
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> 
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that it's appearing there, grantco.
> 
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming
> from someone who doesn't know where he's writing.
> 
>
> You're the one who made the claim, grantco, therefore the burden of
> proof falls on your shoulders, not mine.

but I don't like spam, bruce.