Code Comments

Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.
For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines | New: Database administration forum
Registration is free! Edit your profileCalendarFind other membersFrequently Asked QuestionsSearch -> 
Post New Thread











Thread
Author

Re: WRONG (was: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were inventing C)
IBM does provide exploitation of its 64-bit architecture for those products 
that
they think there is an advantage for such.

--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Robert Wagner" <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote in message
 news:tc4gl0h5asf9bqq5mbabi22f51smgmpltk@
4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 03:18:47 GMT, "William M. Klein"
> <wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
>
> When IBM said LE, I assumed that meant 64-bit. There is little point
> in paying for a 64-bit machine, then failing to use the extra
> capacity.



Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
William M. Klein
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Sponsored Links




Last Thread Next Thread Next
Search this forum -> 
Post New Thread

Cobol archive

Show a Printable Version Send to friend Email This Page to Someone! subscribe to this thread Receive updates to this thread
Computer Consultants
Programming Jobs
Visual Basic Controls
SQL Server Programming
Webservices
Java Security
Visual Studio
C# Programming
Visual J++
Software engineering
Open source Software
Perl Programming
PHP Programming
ASP Programming
ASP .NET Programming
Visual Basic Programming
Windows Scripting Host
Java Programming
Java Help
Java Beans
VBScript
Cobol
MAC Applications
Unix Programming
Forum Jump:
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 AM.

 
Free MCSE Braindumps | Real Estate Topics

Programming forum archive

Copyrights CodeComments.com 2004 - 2006

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.