Re: WRONG (was: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were i

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 03:18:47 GMT, "William M. Klein"
<wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> wrote:

>"Robert Wagner" <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote in message
> news:culel0161kn9jkaek60qgk093s5c1vbm76@
4ax.com... 
><snip> 
>
>Wrong,  Very WRONG, without any supporting information,
>
>(In fact there the current IBM response to user request to provide a 64-bit
>compiler for z/OS has varied from negative to semi-negative.)

When IBM said LE, I assumed that meant 64-bit. There is little point
in paying for a 64-bit machine, then failing to use the extra
capacity.