Code Comments

Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.
For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines | New: Database administration forum
Registration is free! Edit your profileCalendarFind other membersFrequently Asked QuestionsSearch -> 
Post New Thread











Thread
Author

Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
..    Am  27.09.04
schrieb  robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests (Robert Wagner)
auf  /COMP/LANG/COBOL
in  culel0161kn9jkaek60qgk093s5c1vbm76@4ax.com
ueber  Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were inventi
n

RW> Although 64-bit is rare on desktops, it is common on servers and
RW> mainframes. Intel is testing the low-end waters with the 64-bit
RW> Pentium 4, and AMD with the Opteron. Complete computers with either
RW> chip sell for $500.

I think, only Itanium and Opteron are 64 bit, isn't it? Pentium 4
is also "just" 32 bit, as far as I know.



RW> Unisys Clear Path compiles to 64-bit Wintel ES7000, also IA-64.

The ES7000 server is not one of the Clearpath series; being built
on an array of Intel CPUs (at least up to 32 Itanium CPUs), it runs
either WindowsNt Server or Linux. The Clearpath servers of either the
Univac or Burroughs mainframe tradition incorporate also a subsystem
with Intel-type CPUs, but that is run by WindowsNT or maybe -- I don't
know -- also Linux.

But Unisys does certainly not provide a COBOL compiler neither for
Windows nor for Intel. One would have to use the Microfocus or Fujitsu
compilers. Unisys provides compilers for their OS/2200 and MCP based
mainframe lines.


MfG,
Lüko Willms                                     http://www.mlwerke.de
/--------- L.WILLMS@jpberlin.de -- Alle Rechte vorbehalten --

"Kein Land kann seine Probleme in dieser globalisierten Welt allein
auf sich gestellt lösen. Entweder wir retten uns alle zusammen oder
wir gehen zusammen unter. Heute mehr denn je gilt das Wort von José
Martí: Das Vaterland ist die ganze Menschheit."
- Fidel Castro, Caracas (Veneuzuela), 3. Februar 1999

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Lueko Willms
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
On 27 Sep 2004 08:22:00 GMT, l.willms@jpberlin.de (Lueko Willms)
wrote:

>.    Am  27.09.04
>schrieb  robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests (Robert Wagner)
>    auf  /COMP/LANG/COBOL
>     in  culel0161kn9jkaek60qgk093s5c1vbm76@4ax.com
>  ueber  Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous" (was: If you were inve
ntin
>
>RW> Although 64-bit is rare on desktops, it is common on servers and
>RW> mainframes. Intel is testing the low-end waters with the 64-bit
>RW> Pentium 4, and AMD with the Opteron. Complete computers with either
>RW> chip sell for $500.
>
>   I think, only Itanium and Opteron are 64 bit, isn't it? Pentium 4
>is also "just" 32 bit, as far as I know.

No, Pentium 4 is 64 bit. So too is Xeon.

>RW> Unisys Clear Path compiles to 64-bit Wintel ES7000, also IA-64.
>
>   The ES7000 server is not one of the Clearpath series; being built
>on an array of Intel CPUs (at least up to 32 Itanium CPUs), it runs
>either WindowsNt Server or Linux. The Clearpath servers of either the
>Univac or Burroughs mainframe tradition incorporate also a subsystem
>with Intel-type CPUs, but that is run by WindowsNT or maybe -- I don't
>know -- also Linux.

You're right. ES7000 is not marketed as ClearPath.

>   But Unisys does certainly not provide a COBOL compiler neither for
>Windows nor for Intel. One would have to use the Microfocus or Fujitsu
>compilers. Unisys provides compilers for their OS/2200 and MCP based
>mainframe lines.

The ES7000 compiler looks like a rebadged Micro Focus.

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Robert Wagner
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
..    Am  27.09.04
schrieb  robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests (Robert Wagner)
auf  /COMP/LANG/COBOL
in  ff3gl01qu1k1u47h5qnq4iv9te7qc26bem@4ax.com
ueber  Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"

RW> You're right. ES7000 is not marketed as ClearPath.
 

RW> The ES7000 compiler looks like a rebadged Micro Focus.

Frankly, I do not believe that Unisys provides their own compilers
for either the Windows or the Linux version of the ES7000.

Where did you find such information?


Yours,
Lüko Willms                                     http://www.mlwerke.de
/--------- L.WILLMS@jpberlin.de -- Alle Rechte vorbehalten --

"Das Volk, das ein anderes Volk unterjocht, schmiedet seine eigenen
Ketten."                         - Karl Marx           (1. Januar 1870)

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Lueko Willms
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
Robert Wagner <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote
 
>
> No, Pentium 4 is 64 bit. So too is Xeon.

That is not entirely true.  'Pentium 4' is just 32 bit.  There is no
64 bit in a 'Pentium 4'.  There is a newer different processor that is
called the 'Pentium 4 EE' (Extreme Edition) that does have the 64 bit
extensions roughly as AMD has.

To use the 64 bit mode you have to run Linux.

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Richard
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
On 27 Sep 2004 15:05:00 GMT, l.willms@jpberlin.de (Lueko Willms)
wrote:

>.    Am  27.09.04
>schrieb  robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests (Robert Wagner)
>    auf  /COMP/LANG/COBOL
>     in  ff3gl01qu1k1u47h5qnq4iv9te7qc26bem@4ax.com
>  ueber  Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
>
>RW> You're right. ES7000 is not marketed as ClearPath.
> 
>
>RW> The ES7000 compiler looks like a rebadged Micro Focus.
>
>   Frankly, I do not believe that Unisys provides their own compilers
>for either the Windows or the Linux version of the ES7000.
>
>   Where did you find such information?

Chuck Stevens' response is definitive.

I got that impression from this Web page:

http://www.unisys.com/products/es70...on/services.htm

But here a Unisys manager says the tool is branded Micro Focus:

http://www.microfocus.com/closeup/v...ue3/partner.asp

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Robert Wagner
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
On 27 Sep 2004 13:11:23 -0700, riplin@Azonic.co.nz (Richard) wrote:

>Robert Wagner <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote
> 
>
>That is not entirely true.  'Pentium 4' is just 32 bit.  There is no
>64 bit in a 'Pentium 4'.  There is a newer different processor that is
>called the 'Pentium 4 EE' (Extreme Edition) that does have the 64 bit
>extensions roughly as AMD has.

Not roughly, exactly. It's ironic to see Intel reverse engineering AMD
.. something that Intel engineers used to laugh at AMD for doing.

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Robert Wagner
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
Robert Wagner <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote
 
>
> Not roughly, exactly.

They may be compatible but they are implemented differently, thus they
are not 'identical'.

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Richard
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
Robert Wagner <robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests> wrote
 
>
> Not roughly, exactly.

Further to previous reply:

"""Intel EM64T

In the face of the competition from the AMD64, Intel released the
EM64T architecture in February, 2004. This is a 64-bit chip which is
largely instruction-set compatible with the AMD64, with very minor
differences in implementation [1]
(http://www.maximumpc.com/reprints/r...004-04-07b.html). It is
expected that EM64T will be fully compatible with AMD64 in later
revisions. EM64T is apparently based on an earlier specification of
the AMD64 architecture, which AMD had released prior to the actual
launch of the Hammer family of processors."""

> It's ironic to see Intel reverse engineering AMD
> .. something that Intel engineers used to laugh at AMD for doing.

Well they obviously didn't 'reverse engineer', they used published
specifications.

That's 2 for 2, _again_.

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Richard
09-28-04 08:55 AM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
..     Am  27.09.04
schrieb  robert@wagner.net.yourmammaharvests (Robert Wagner)
bei  /COMP/LANG/COBOL
in  r98hl0dbmscos3tce2sl0bedcud90efdqj@4ax.com
ueber  Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
 

RW> Chuck Stevens' response is definitive.

Sure, he _works_ at Unisys, I only follow it for nostalgia.

RW> I got that impression from this Web page:
RW>
RW> http://www.unisys.com/products/es70...s__solutions/wi
RW> ndows__stan dardization/services.htm

But this clearly speaks only about _migration_ tools, not a
Compiler, and does not mention at all addressing mode.

RW> But here a Unisys manager says the tool is branded Micro Focus:
RW>
RW> http://www.microfocus.com/closeup/v...ue3/partner.asp

Thanks for the pointer. The guy (Brig Campbell from Mission Viejo)
is praising the ES7000 with Windows, but now Unisys offers also Linux
for it...

Anyway, also from that interview I conclude that the Unisys offer
consist of migration tools and migration assistance.


Yours,
Lüko Willms                                     http://www.mlwerke.de
/--------- L.WILLMS@jpberlin.de -- Alle Rechte vorbehalten --

"Nach meiner Ansicht besitzt die Presse _das_ _Recht_,
Schriftsteller, Politiker, Komödianten und andere öffentliche
Charaktere zu _beleidigen_. Achtete ich [so einen Angriff gegen mich]
einer Notiz wert, so galt mir in solchen Fällen der Wahlspruch: ŕ
corsaire, corsaire et demi [auf einen Schelmen anderthalben]."
- Karl Marx   17.11.1860  (Herr Vogt, Kapitel XI)

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Lueko Willms
09-28-04 01:55 PM


Re: "Goto statement considered superfluous"
Lueko Willms wrote:
>
>    Anyway, also from that interview I conclude that the Unisys offer
> consist of migration tools and migration assistance.

Of course - their customers are used to getting a suite of software with
their hardware.  :)  Wonder if I could get in on any 2200-to-Linux
conversions - that would be pretty ...


--
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~   /   \  /         ~        Live from Montgomery, AL!       ~
~  /     \/       o  ~                                        ~
~ /      /\   -   |  ~          LXi0007@Netscape.net          ~
~ _____ /  \      |  ~ http://www.knology.net/~mopsmom/daniel ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~         I do not read e-mail at the above address           ~
~    Please see website if you wish to contact me privately   ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ GEEKCODE 3.12 GCS/IT d s-:+ a C++ L++ E--- W++ N++ o? K- w$ ~
~ !O M-- V PS+ PE++ Y? !PGP t+ 5? X+ R* tv b+ DI++ D+ G- e    ~
~ h---- r+++ z++++                                            ~
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
LX-i
09-28-04 08:55 PM


Sponsored Links




Last Thread Next Thread Next
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Search this forum -> 
Post New Thread

Cobol archive

Show a Printable Version Send to friend Email This Page to Someone! subscribe to this thread Receive updates to this thread
Computer Consultants
Programming Jobs
Visual Basic Controls
SQL Server Programming
Webservices
Java Security
Visual Studio
C# Programming
Visual J++
Software engineering
Open source Software
Perl Programming
PHP Programming
ASP Programming
ASP .NET Programming
Visual Basic Programming
Windows Scripting Host
Java Programming
Java Help
Java Beans
VBScript
Cobol
MAC Applications
Unix Programming
Forum Jump:
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM.

 
Free MCSE Braindumps | Real Estate Topics

Programming forum archive

Copyrights CodeComments.com 2004 - 2006

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.