Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.Rui, I spent the last 2 hours fixing the Auth_HTTP installation at my employer server where we use it extensively for some professional applications. The combination Auth 1.2.3 stable Auth_HTTP 2.1.1 beta Works fine as I did fixed the SessionSharing mess. Now, if you install Auth_HTTP 2.1.2 we have a BC break and the user is asked to upgrade to Auth 1.3.0r2. Now, this is serious. Auth_HTTP should have gone stable with 2.1.1. where I fixed the major SessionSharing issue. Why? because now a user which has the default stable as preferred status ( the great majority) will end up with the combination Auth 1.2.3 and Auth_HTTP 2.0. This combination expose the users of Auth_HTTP 2.0 to the major Session Sharing bug and possible a security problem. What's that ? if you have 2 protected areas on your site (separate areas with different realms, let' say an area called users and an area called administrators) a user who gained access to the first realm will be automatically logged on the second separate realm regardless of his credentials. In fact he will not even be prompted for a secondary log in. To summarize, I don't understand how you released Auth_HTTP 2.1.2 requiring Auth 1.3.0r2. without a) dropping me a line, after all I am lead on this package ; b) breaking BC ( and obviously without testing. Every simple test will reveal that 2.1.2 and 1.3.0r2 don't work with a previous Auth_HTTP implementation). 2.1.1 should go stable and, even if 4 days elapsed, I would go to pull/remove 2.1.2. Suggestions from other QA members are very welcome, Regards David Costa
Post Follow-up to this message
Show a Printable Version
Email This Page to Someone!
Receive updates to this thread
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.