Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.Can anyone point me to specs for MicroFocus's CGI support in NetExpress? I am finding a limitation of approximately 4K for ACCEPT verbs against a CGI page with large textual input fields--not sure where the culprit is, but I'm sure I should be able to extend that limitation. I am running apache on Windows2000, and I am developing the server-side code using NetExpress. Thanks. Dick McMullen
Post Follow-up to this messageAre you looking at all the other generated source files? As I recall there's two other source files that gets generated when you first generate a page in your project and complete it. Are you looking at those? I remember pushing a lot of data around in NetExpress, so I'm not really sure exactly what is going on in your case. My first thought is that it has a default receipt value in one of these other files that you are exceeding. Of course, there's other possibilities, but if you want to ask any more questions, just reply. Though I have several references here in hand, I don't know of any online references or anything that I can point you to. Sorry. On 8 Aug 2004 10:41:57 -0700, dick@stillwater-mcmullens.net (Dick McMullen) wrote: >Can anyone point me to specs for MicroFocus's CGI support in >NetExpress? > >I am finding a limitation of approximately 4K for ACCEPT verbs against >a CGI page with large textual input fields--not sure where the culprit >is, but I'm sure I should be able to extend that limitation. > >I am running apache on Windows2000, and I am developing the >server-side code using NetExpress.
Post Follow-up to this messagedick@stillwater-mcmullens.net (Dick McMullen) wrote > I am finding a limitation of approximately 4K for ACCEPT verbs against > a CGI page with large textual input fields--not sure where the culprit > is, but I'm sure I should be able to extend that limitation. > > I am running apache on Windows2000, and I am developing the > server-side code using NetExpress. I would assume that you are using POST method as most browsers have a lower limit than this for GET method - eg IE is limited to total of 2083 in the URL string. Check your apache configuration, for example for: LimitRequestBody LimitRequestFields
Post Follow-up to this messageNow that I got to look at one of my old projects... The other poster is right. Look at whether you are using GET, or POST as a CGI exec method. There is a limitation on how many bytes can be passed under GET method. Look at your CPF file. The fields there must match your CPY file. On 8 Aug 2004 10:41:57 -0700, dick@stillwater-mcmullens.net (Dick McMullen) wrote: >Can anyone point me to specs for MicroFocus's CGI support in >NetExpress?
Post Follow-up to this messageHi Dick, Which version (and FixPack level) of Net Express are you running? There was an issue regarding a 4K limitation of data handled by CGI ACCEPT and DISPLAY statements in the base release of Net Express 3.1, which was corrected in the Accept/Display CGI Syntax Fixpack (acc00n31.exe). If you're running the base release of Net Express 3.1, I would strongly recommend upgrading to the very latest fix level -- you can download these from http://supportline.microfocus.com/ . SimonT.
Post Follow-up to this messageAll, 1) I am using POST, not GET, so I believe I am OK there; 2) apache reports the appropriate content_length after the POST, but I will check the apache config; 3) The NetExpress 4K limitation sounds like it may be the cause. I will also check that. Thanks to all of you for your ideas. Dick "Simon Tobias" <Simon.Tobias@nospam.microfocus.com> wrote in message news:<cf7gjg$4uh$1@hyp erion.microfocus.com>... > Hi Dick, > > Which version (and FixPack level) of Net Express are you running? There wa s > an issue regarding a 4K limitation of data handled by CGI ACCEPT and DISPL AY > statements in the base release of Net Express 3.1, which was corrected in > the Accept/Display CGI Syntax Fixpack (acc00n31.exe). > > If you're running the base release of Net Express 3.1, I would strongly > recommend upgrading to the very latest fix level -- you can download these > from http://supportline.microfocus.com/ . > > SimonT.
Post Follow-up to this messageAll, 1) I am using POST, not GET, so I believe I am OK there; 2) apache reports the appropriate content_length after the POST, but I will check the apache config; 3) The NetExpress 4K limitation sounds like it may be the cause. I will also check that. Thanks to all of you for your ideas. Dick "Simon Tobias" <Simon.Tobias@nospam.microfocus.com> wrote in message news:<cf7gjg$4uh$1@hyp erion.microfocus.com>... > Hi Dick, > > Which version (and FixPack level) of Net Express are you running? There wa s > an issue regarding a 4K limitation of data handled by CGI ACCEPT and DISPL AY > statements in the base release of Net Express 3.1, which was corrected in > the Accept/Display CGI Syntax Fixpack (acc00n31.exe). > > If you're running the base release of Net Express 3.1, I would strongly > recommend upgrading to the very latest fix level -- you can download these > from http://supportline.microfocus.com/ . > > SimonT.
Post Follow-up to this messageNow that I got to look at one of my old projects... The other poster is right. Look at whether you are using GET, or POST as a CGI exec method. There is a limitation on how many bytes can be passed under GET method. Look at your CPF file. The fields there must match your CPY file. On 8 Aug 2004 10:41:57 -0700, dick@stillwater-mcmullens.net (Dick McMullen) wrote: >Can anyone point me to specs for MicroFocus's CGI support in >NetExpress?
Post Follow-up to this messagedick@stillwater-mcmullens.net (Dick McMullen) wrote > I am finding a limitation of approximately 4K for ACCEPT verbs against > a CGI page with large textual input fields--not sure where the culprit > is, but I'm sure I should be able to extend that limitation. > > I am running apache on Windows2000, and I am developing the > server-side code using NetExpress. I would assume that you are using POST method as most browsers have a lower limit than this for GET method - eg IE is limited to total of 2083 in the URL string. Check your apache configuration, for example for: LimitRequestBody LimitRequestFields
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.