use vs. require in modules

i have 4 packages:

PackageA
use IO::File;
require My::Utils::Reader

PackageB
use IO::File;
use XML::Writer;

My::Utils::Reader
use My::Utils;

My::Utils
use Exporter;

in my perl program, i dynamically load PackageA and PackageB like this:

eval("require $package_name1");
eval("require $package_name2");

my question is why does PackageA have to "require My::Utils::Reader" instead
of "use My::Utils::Reader"?  PackageB dynamically loads fine and it "uses"
other packages.  in fact, every package i list here uses "use" instead of
require.  why is there an exception for PackageA and "require
My::Utils::Reader"?

thanks for the help.

>>>>> "Christopher" == Christopher J Bottaro <cjbottaro@alumni.cs.utexas.edu
> writes:

Christopher> My::Utils
Christopher> use Exporter;

Do you have "@ISA = Exporter" too?  Much easier to write this as

use base 'Exporter';

This might be why it needs to be require'd instead of use'd.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training
!

heh, that was it, thanks a bunch.

Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
 
>
> Christopher> My::Utils
> Christopher> use Exporter;
>
> Do you have "@ISA = Exporter" too?  Much easier to write this as
>
>         use base 'Exporter';
>
> This might be why it needs to be require'd instead of use'd.
>