Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.I was out-of-town since last w. I usually try and acknowledge my errors as soon as they get pointed out to me. Please excuse the mis-information that I put out last w
about HP's member ship in J4. I do, however, still think that I am correct in saying that ONLY Micro Focus has made any "public" statement committing to (ever) providing a fully conformin g 2002 compiler. (Fujitsu-Siemens - not "PC" Fujitsu - may have done so also, but I am not sure one way or another about that) -- Bill Klein wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com "Jeff Lanam" <jeff-dot-lanam@hp-dot-com-not.net> wrote in message news:peg8e0p1qgivkb1ov4bpgpvcv2kd6vfv86@ 4ax.com... > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 03:35:11 GMT, "William M. Klein" > <wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> wrote: > > > HP is indeed still represented on the standards committee, unless you > know something my management hasn't told me. > > As far as enabling standards diagnostics, I doubt that many users turn > them on on their regular builds. I suspect they make one compilation > before beginning a porting project to a new platform. > > Jeff Lanam HP NonStop COBOL Project INCITS/J4 > NonStop Enterprise Division > Hewlett-Packard
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.