Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.And after only 10 years they have gotten NT5.0 (Win2k) down to only occasional kernel panics and page thrashings. (I haven't moved to XP yet, but I don't expect much.) Original design is great, but what Micro$oft actually releases is what it needs to be judged on. In article <sWhDc.4668$x9.4281@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>, "Paul Raulerson" <pkraulerson@verizon.net> wrote: > Actually, Windows is both, much as it irks me to admit it. 99% of the > troubles with windows > are related to the fact it has to run on an ungodly number of hardware > configurations. Something > that was *not* really in its original design. Dave Cutler, the real mind > behind the core of Windows NT, came to Microsoft fresh > from success with DEC VMS, which is a beautiful OS, > incredibly stable, and to which NT has amazing similarities. ;) But VMS ra n > on a restricted range > of hardware, and an even more restricted range of firmware. > > NT on the other paw, runs on a tens of thousands of different hardware > devices, and quite > literally, millions of combinations of that hardware. A daunting task inde ed. > > Most of the software issues with NT are definitely not in the 'core' OS, b ut > are related to peripheral software products, like > Internet Explorer. :) > > -Paul > > "Joe Zitzelberger" <joe_zitzelberger@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:joe_zitzelberger-C0F17F.19365725062004@corp.supernews.com... > >
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.