Re: OT: Racial superiority / Intelligent design was Re:

On Jan 30, 5:20=A0pm, "tlmfru" <la...@mts.net> wrote:
> <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:52699060-f88f-4896-b219-475e1124ce92@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 29, 6:02 pm, "tlmfru" <la...@mts.net> wrote:
> 
> opinions 
>
> Projection noted.
> 
>
> Only if you pay money; otherwise I have other things to do.
> Intelligent people don't let other people set the agenda in terms
> which make only one answer possible
> 

Two things.

1.  Kindly indent your posts in a standard way.

2.  Improve your grasp of logic.

The remainder of your post seems to consist of demands and bluster,
with a consistent refusal to address the points that I am making.
Well that is your right; but I'm not sure why you bothered. The
bluster of those who refuse to put their own belief-systems on the
table isn't impressive to those of us who assess things rationally and
sceptically.  Until you try to do this, in a sensible and
intellectually coherent manner, nothing that you say can be taken as
anything but a rationalisation of self-servingness (I mean no insult;
but unless it is the outworking of a rational system, what else can it
be?)  That isn't something which words will help you with.

All the best,

Roger Pearse