Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.On 26 Jan, 18:45, "tlmfru" <la...@mts.net> wrote: > <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote in message > > news:506de0df-d205-4c06-ba1a-37a08770bfa2@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On Jan 25, 12:26 am, "Pete Dashwood" > > <dashw...@removethis.enternet.co.nz> wrote: > he > > So there must have been texts with un-respectable credentials or else you > couldn't make that statement. =A0So trexts WERE excluded. =A0Do you really=[/color ] think > the Council was a free and democratic deabte? You know, wouldn't it better to find out the facts BEFORE dogmatising like this? 1. The Council of Nicaea made no statements or decisions relating to the canon. None, zero, zip. OK? 2. You talk about texts being excluded. Naturally the church did not accept into its services books forged by outsiders much later in order to propagate paganism, or novels, or whatever. Why should it? You seem to insinuate in some way this is unreasonable. It isn't. > > You're ... (change of subject snipped) Tu quoque noted. > > You'll have to be a great deal more convincing than that. =A0(etc) I fear that your own beliefs are merely based on convenience, and often merely the convenience of those who know how to sucker *you*. So I'm sorry that the truth is inconvenient, and I wish you well with your second-hand day dream. I would suggest we be more sceptical of what we think you know, and rather more open-minded. If you must throw stones, please at least be original. All the best, Roger Pearse
Post Follow-up to this messageOn Jan 31, 3:09=A0pm, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:09:53 -0800 (PST), > > "roger.pea...@googlemail.com" <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > When ancient data don't support my beliefs, I need to work more at > interpreting which parts really matter (so that my beliefs get the > support I want). A bit cynical, surely? The ancient data base on any topic is seldom so extensive that we can't know *all* of it. Convenience is always a false belief system. All the best, Roger Pearse
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.