M`I 5.Persecutio n ` MI 5 Insis t th at the se Faxes m ust Contin ue

MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 31 March, 2000

22,544. Faxes Delivered in Three Years, and Still No Breakthrough

In the last three years I have. sent at least 22,544 faxes to recipients in
the UK, of which at least. 13,974 have gone to Westminster. Last wend
alone I sent 832 completed faxes. to politicians, the media and various
others, on the subject of MI5s mistreatment of. me these last ten years.

I believe some. of the recipients know of MI5s actions against me in the
last decade; yet they. maintain strict "omerta" in fear of the security
services persecution actions. being made public.

MI5 Insist. that these Faxes must Continue

Between September 1999. and mid-January 2000, the persecutors, whoever they
might be, mostly left me alone.. I counted only three incidents in almost
five months - which. is a lower rate than at any time since June 1990, when
this business. started.

By leaving me alone for several months, the "oppressors" were making. an
implicit assurance that they would continue to. leave me alone in the
future. On 11. January I posted to an internet newsgroup accepting what I
saw as their assurance of no further harassment, stating. that I would
cease sending these faxes - which is the only. thing I do in my defence -
if they continued to leave me alone. And for. two ws I did indeed
refrain from distributing. these articles.

But MI5 acted in bad faith.. From the last w of January until the
beginning of March, they. resumed their hate campaign against me with a
vengeance. They. even put people in my road three times in February, one
instance. of which I recorded. They resumed their normal behaviour of
bugging my phone and house, listening to where I would go, and. then
placing people in. that location to "aggravate and annoy" me.

What MI5 did in February is. plainly a contravention of the Protection from
Harassment Act 1997, since it has. caused me "alarm and distress" as
specified in the Act. But it is a waste of time going to the police with. a
complaint, since the police. have done, and will do, absolutely nothing. I
complained to. the Metropolitan Police in 1995, and they refused to take my
complaint. When I complained again. in 1999, the detective sergeant laughed
at my complaint, with the words, "It's an absolute load of rubbish.. I
don't investigate rubbish. I can't be more blunt or. to the point than
that." It is useful. to remember that the Met also treated Stephen
Lawrences parents with similar discourtesy; police prejudices. are similar
in my case, so I can take. some comfort from that case and hope that one
day I will get a. fair hearing.

MI5 acted in bad faith,. but they also acted with arrogance. They do not
care if I send 800 faxes every wend, since they know. I cannot prove my
claims, and the recent Shayler case shows. how weak external oversight is
of the. secret services. But they acted with more than arrogance - the MI5
agents actually want. my faxes to continue, they insist that these faxes
continue, since my. communications give them an excuse to continue their
activities, and. continue in the paid employ of the secret service. Despite
their use of diverse proxies over the last ten years, it is the. same MI5
officers behind the campaign all the. time - I have seen one of them on
three occasions in. Canada over a period of years, and it is a safe belief
that. that same person continues to be paid for his "work" in harassing me
in London now. The average cost of. an MI5 employee is some 75,000 per
annum, so one. may infer that their officers are amply compensated; their
insistence that "hostilities" are maintained is understandable. when placed
in this. light.

12004


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem