Re: RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and

In article <4ecef3pp06uqhou3340v75qqn9lv6320jk@4ax.com>,
Robert  <no@e.mail> wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:13:23 +1200, "Pete Dashwood"
><dashwood@removethis.enternet.co.nz>
>wrote:
> 
>
>If generalizations were invalid (including this one), employers wouldn't
>ask how many
>years of experience you have.

Some generalisations might be valid, others not; two points are needed to
determine a line, three points a curve... and the condition of COBOL code
might, possible, be a more complex phenomenon than those.

DD