Re: RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:13:23 +1200, "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@removethis.ent
ernet.co.nz>
wrote:

>"Robert" <no@e.mail> wrote in message
> news:gqfdf3tp66qpm4hcold28fmhh5um18v77d@
4ax.com... 
><snip>> 
>
>It demonstrates that in THAT place, at THAT time, half the code was
>superfluous. You cannot extend that to ALL (or even ANY) other sites.

If generalizations were invalid (including this one), employers wouldn't ask
 how many
years of experience you have. Whatever you learned previously doesn't apply.

For that matter, CLC shouldn't exist. Expert knowledge from previous experie
nce doesn't
apply to today's problems.