Re: CONSTANT ENTRY (was "forward" references (was: COBOL subscript range c

"Rick Smith" <ricksmith@mfi.net> wrote in message
news:13dc83o19ril2a8@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@removethis.enternet.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:5jmf1nFb2q4U1@mid.individual.net... 
> reference, 
> the 
> interested 
>
> It is not clear to me exactly how the total absence of
> personal pronouns in my comments should be construed
> as personal; however, let me clarify.
>
> I took one paragraph completely out of context because
> its words stimulated some thoughts. I then wrote and
> posted those thoughts for interested readers to consider.
>
> Nothing more than that was intended.
>
OK. I 've let it go.

You might consider that when you respond in a thread to a specifc post, the
person postng it has reason to believe you are responding to them. If what
you say then appears to dispute what has already been said, then there will
be a reaction. It doesn't require personal pronouns :-)

I have nothing more to say on this thread anyway.

Pete.
--
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."