Re: Riemann' Hypothesis and the Million $ price

In article <dp3j105hhuucdf8rjsethojb8ih1k7jceu@4ax.com>,
Habitant <berlutte@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Eulerians need not apply.

What the hell does that mean?

> Couldn't get it is all!

Of course you couldn't get it; you don't even know what the problem is.

The World Wide Wade wrote:

> In article <dp3j105hhuucdf8rjsethojb8ih1k7jceu@4ax.com>,
>  Habitant <berlutte@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> 
>
> What the hell does that mean?
> 
>
> Of course you couldn't get it; you don't even know what the problem is.

A joke, a joke: a (shudder) pun even.  Euler is pronounced "oiler".  Surely
we could do something with "gauss", or "abel", "cantor", "gage", etc., etc.

PL

In article <404A2D14.C1CDA58C@mb.sympatico.ca>,
Peter Lacey <lacey@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote:
 
>
> A joke, a joke: a (shudder) pun even.  Euler is pronounced "oiler".  Surel
y
> we could do something with "gauss", or "abel", "cantor", "gage", etc., etc.[/color
]

I think you're missing the point. This Habitant nutjob is an acolyte of
Lyndon Larouche, who once took a break from the Queen of England's drug
cartel to lecture on complex analysis and inform the world that Euler was a
Satanist. I can't believe they want to close this ng!!!

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:13:29 -0800, The World Wide Wade
<waderameyxiii@comcast.remove13.net> waded in and vomited:

>
>I think you're missing the point. This Habitant nutjob is an acolyte of
>Lyndon Larouche, who once took a break from the Queen of England's drug
>cartel to lecture on complex analysis and inform the world that Euler was a
>Satanist. I can't believe they want to close this ng!!!

Me neither! Flattery will lead you nowhere though.


LaRouche Leads Democrats in Itemized Individual Contributions
February 28, 2004
For more information call 1-800-929-7566.

Feb. 28 -- Democratic Presidential pre-candidate Lyndon LaRouche now
leads all the remaining Democratic Presidential candidates, in the
cumulative number of individual itemized contributions to his
campaign, as measured by the Federal Election Commission. This figure
dramatically underscores the fact that LaRouche has a depth and
breadth of popular support among ordinary citizens, far beyond his
rivals. The FEC defines an "itemized individual contribution" as a
contribution by a person who has given more than $200 to a campaign.

The sharp contrast between this reality, and both the near-total lack
of coverage of LaRouche's campaign in the major media, and the
suppression of his vote, should raise sharp questions about corruption
within the media, and the Democratic National Committee.

As of the FEC's February 2004 report, LaRouche had 36,281 cumulative
itemized contributions, as compared to 25,899 for John Kerry, the
second ranking candidate, and respectively less for John Edwards,
Dennis Kucinich, and Al Sharpton. LaRouche comes in third in overall
funds raised, with $6.735 million.
 ========================================
=================
How about that creepo?

In article <tslr40lhuebck1soicmi5hu1s5t13gcubq@4ax.com>,
berlutte@sympatico.ca wrote:
 
>
> Me neither! Flattery will lead you nowhere though.
>
> LaRouche Leads Democrats in Itemized Individual Contributions
> February 28, 2004
> For more information call 1-800-929-7566.
>
> Feb. 28 -- Democratic Presidential pre-candidate Lyndon LaRouche now
> leads all the remaining Democratic Presidential candidates, in the
> cumulative number of individual itemized contributions to his
> campaign, as measured by the Federal Election Commission. This figure
> dramatically underscores the fact that LaRouche has a depth and
> breadth of popular support among ordinary citizens, far beyond his
> rivals. The FEC defines an "itemized individual contribution" as a
> contribution by a person who has given more than $200 to a campaign.
>
> The sharp contrast between this reality, and both the near-total lack
> of coverage of LaRouche's campaign in the major media, and the
> suppression of his vote, should raise sharp questions about corruption
> within the media, and the Democratic National Committee.
>
> As of the FEC's February 2004 report, LaRouche had 36,281 cumulative
> itemized contributions, as compared to 25,899 for John Kerry, the
> second ranking candidate, and respectively less for John Edwards,
> Dennis Kucinich, and Al Sharpton. LaRouche comes in third in overall
> funds raised, with $6.735 million.

Dear doomjob: 36,281 x 200 = 7,256,200.

By the way, if you go to the FEC website, you'll see Larouche is just
foaming at the mouth, pulling statistics out of his ass, making up shit,
... cuz he knows his doom-monkey followers with their little brains will
believe any stupid thing he says.

>  ========================================
=================
> How about that creepo?

Larouche is a real creepo, we finally agree on something.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 16:44:08 -0800, The World Wide Wade
<waderameyxiii@comcast.remove13.net> wrote:
 
>
>Dear doomjob: 36,281 x 200 = 7,256,200.

7,256,200 - 6,735,000 = 521,000

Monies are coming so fast they can't keep count.

>By the way, if you go to the FEC website, you'll see Larouche is just
>foaming at the mouth, pulling statistics out of his ass, making up shit,
>... cuz he knows his doom-monkey followers with their little brains will
>believe any stupid thing he says.

Care to post a link, polly-o?

By the by, here's what happened under Bush 41 watch:
http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/exonappendix1.htm

Appaling to know that you're coming out from under the same rock,
creepy-crawly thang.

Signatures of brave men who didn't stand for that legal circus:
http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/signat1.htm

Shame on you!

On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:43:46 -0800, The Wurld Double-Wide Wade
<waderameyxiii@comcast.remove13.net> erupted thusly:

rrrrrip
 
>
>Just go the FEC website, assuming you can point and click, and take a look.
>You'll find nothing like the weird figures your messiah is tossing around.

That's 'Messiah' to you Sir!

The FEC page is quite typical of a US Fedgov's 'user-uncordial' design
with bits of info spread to, yonder and fro. Casual perusal is
discouraged. You will never see in your lifetime ONE flashing link
pointing to a breakdown table grouping all the candidates for 2004.

Some of use are quite familiar with this shadowy bunch going back
decades. I would't be surprised if they took some liberties with the
numbers. Like your votin' machines thangs! Bwahaha! Poor naive lil'
Wady.

(Hum)

Second time then: please be so mean as to put some meat on your bones
o' contention with a clear link to the FEC site where all and sundry
can verify yer wild calumnies or publicly admit that yer a fool, a
knave *and* an impotent blowhard...

rrrrrip

>Who gives a shit about this or any other ravings a lunatic might post at
>his web site?

Or on this *way* too tolerant ng for that matter.

But, in the spirit of free speach, you are free to cover yourself with
the ample mantle of ridicule.

Now, here are some items to get you really foamin':

Freemasons bombed in Turkey:
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stor...w/74815/1/.html
Won't see that explanation on your garbage teevee, will you now?

Here's what makes Wide Wade spread his chs with growls o' joy:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Stor...,999737,00.html

Meanwhile back at the 'Honky's Burden Ranch', 60 mercenaries are
jailed in Zimbabwe as you surely ignore:
http://www.newzimbabwe.com/pages/plane12.1527.html

Executive Outcomes ties lead to London and Bush
Executive Intelligence Review January 31, 1997, pp. 42-43
by Roger Moore and Linda de Hoyos

Exposes appearing on both sides of the Atlantic on the mercenary
group Executive Outcomes, threaten to blow the lid off the British
intelligence nexus already identified as responsible for the February
1986 murder of Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme, and for the current
cataclysmic destabilization of Africa on behalf of circles associated
with the Queen of England's Privy Council and Sir George Bush.
The exposes appeared in the French daily {Le Figaro} on Jan. 16,
the {London Observer} on Jan. 17, and the February issue of the
American magazine {Harper's.}
Executive Outcomes is the mercenary arm of a vast
network of British-South African corporations dealing in gold,
diamonds, and oil, primarily, but not exclusively, in Africa, that
come under the umbrella of Strategic Resources Corporation,
headquartered in Pretoria, South Africa. Described universally as an
``advance guard of a corporate network that includes mining, oil, and
construction companies,'' Executive Outcomes is active in 13 African
countries, including Uganda. For its services, it demands a lien or
franchise on the exportable raw resources, particularly mineral
wealth, of the client country--in the same fashion as the British East
India Company of the 18th and 19th centuries, which in turn functioned
as the ``advance guard'' of the British monarchy.


(Note: SImon Mann has been caught in Harare too)
Executive Outcomes was incorporated offshore, on the Isle of Man, in
1993, by Anthony Buckingham, a British businessman, and Simon Mann, a
former British officer, the {Observer} reported, based on a leak to it
from British intelligence. Buckingham is also chief executive of
Heritage Oil and Gas, which in turn is linked to the Canadian firm
Ranger Oil. Other firms operating out of the same headquarters in
Chelsea Plaza 107, London, include Branch International Ltd. and
Branch Mining Ltd.
Preliminary investigation by {EIR} has further determined that
Executive Outcomes lies at the heart of the British monarch's raw
materials cartels and secret intelligence operations, in conjunction
with Bush's rogue apparat:
Through Sir David Steel, a former leader of the Liberal Party,
Executive Outcomes and, presumably, its deployment, is a subsumed
operation of the Queen's Privy Council. Steel is a close friend of
EO's Buckingham, and is on the board of directors of EO's sister firm,
Heritage Oil and Gas, according to {Le Figaro.} In 1977, Steel was
inducted into the Privy Council, making him the youngest member of
Britain's highest-level policy-making body.
The links between Executive Outcomes and Ranger Oil point to
operational ties with the Bronfman family of Canada, whose scion,
Edgar Bronfman of Toronto Broncorp, sits on the board of directors of
Ranger. Recently, the Bronfman family merged its mammoth real estate
firm, Trizec, with Barrick Gold, whose senior advisory board includes
Sir George Bush. Barrick Gold is deeply involved in northeastern
Zaire, where it has purchased 83,000 square kilometers of land.
Zairean sources report that the so-called Zairean rebel Laurent Kabila
is no more than a mercenary for Barrick and Anglo American Corp.,
sponsored by the British Crown-backed Ugandan and Rwandan militaries.
Executive Outcomes, {Le Figaro} and other sources further verify, is
deeply entrenched in Uganda, the key British marcher-lord state in the
region.
The ability of Executive Outcomes to thrive as privatized
warlords, it is believed, is in part due to the privatization of U.S.
intelligence services by George Bush, who, as vice president,
beginning in 1981, carried out Executive Order 12333, which placed all
U.S. intelligence operations under Bush's personal control.
This may be another reason why Executive Outcomes is deeply
enmeshed in the same networks exposed in a South African courtroom in
September 1996, as responsible for the successful assassination of
Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme in 1986. During the trial of Col.
Eugene de Kock, on 89 counts of murder, conspiracy, and fraud, it was
revealed that de Kock, along with spy-turned-National Party politician
Craig Williamson, had planned the hit on Palme, which, according to de
Kock's co-worker, Brig. Johan ``Dirk'' Coutzee, was carried out by
another former South African intelligence agent, James Anthony ``Ant''
White.
The entire nexus designated, was part of the covert death squad
unit of the South African military policy, called C-10. Executive
Outcomes is from similar turf. Its executive director, Eeben Barlow,
is a former South African special forces officer, who organized
Executive Outcomes from the ``Koevoet,'' according to well-informed
South African sources. The Koevoet is a small police unit that carried
out assassinations during Apartheid, and was also named by {EIR} as
involved in ``Third Force'' operations to provoke black-on-black
violence. Craig Williamson was the primary trainer of Koevoet.
In its October 1996 {Special Report,} ``George Bush and the
12333 Serial Murder Ring,'' {EIR} took note of Williamson's direct
ties to Executive Outcomes. Williamson was a key on-the-ground
organizer for Operation Lock, the brainchild of the Prince Bernhard of
the Netherlands and Prince Philip of England, to carry out
``wetworks'' on behalf of their World Wildlife Fund in Africa. The
{EIR} report documents that ``another outfit, employed by Williamson,
to funnel manpower to [Col. Ian] Crooke and Operation Lock, was
Executive Outcomes, headed by Eeben Barlow, a former South African
military officer who had been active in Angola, providing support to
Savimbi's Unita, but later contracted his `private' security services
to the Angolan government.''
Evidence points to Executive Outcomes being a direct and likely
the biggest spin-off of the British Special Air Services (SAS), formed
in 1941 by the late Lt. Col. David Stirling. The SAS lies outside the
British government's official military structure, and is accountable
to the Sovereign Queen only. According to the British Army handbook,
the SAS--similar to EO today--is ``particularly suited, trained, and
equipped for counter-revolutionary operations,'' specializing ``in
``sabotage,'' ``assassination,'' as well as ``liaison with
organization, training, and control of friendly guerrilla forces
operating against the common enemy.''
Among the sister-firms of Executive Outcomes operating out of
Chelsea Plaza 107 is Capricorn Systems Ltd. As the {Observer} writes:
``It is suspected that the name Capricorn originates with the
`Capricorn Africa Society,' established by the eccentric military hero
who founded SAS, Sir David Stirling, and who was himself involved in
mercenary operations before his death in 1990. Another company which
took the name was CapricornAir,'' which delivered the first EO troops
into Angola in 1993.
In southern Africa, among Stirling's offspring mercenary
services was Kilo Alpha Services (KAS), run by Operation Lock's
Colonel Crooke. Reports are that, upon Stirling's death, KAS was
bought up by Sir Jimmy Goldsmith, the British mogul who also figured
in the Public Diplomacy Donors' List, the key private financiers for
George Bush's illegal Iran-Contra operations in the 1980s.
End it now, or it is the future

The Clinton administration has opposed the use of Executive
Outcomes by governments in Africa. It has officially asked the Angolan
government of President Jose Dos Santos to usher Executive Outcomes,
whose services destroyed the capacities of Jonas Savimbi's Unita, out
the door. State Department spokesman Nicholas Burns reiterated on Jan.
23, in answer to a question by {EIR} correspondent William Jones, ``We
are aware that there are mercenary groups that hire themselves out on
one side or another in a variety of African countries in the past,
certainly in Angola and Sierra Leone. We understand what Executive
Outcomes is. I've done my homework over the last 24 hours. Our advice
to the Angolans, to the Sierra Leoneans, and our advice to all the
actors in eastern Sudan these days, is not to hire mercenary
outfits.''
The ideology of the personnel of Executive Outcomes is doubly
noxious for the Clinton administration. Barlow told {Harper's}
reporter Elizabeth Rubin that he ``encourages his men to read up on
the works of two of Newt Gingrich's gurus, the futurologists Heidi and
Alvin Toffler, whose book {War and Anti-War} offers the pop version''
of Martin Van Creveld's {The Transformation of War,} published in
1991, which argues that wars waged by nation-states will be replaced
by ``war-making entities''--such as mercenary bands, religious
organizations, and commercial organizations such as the British East
India Company.
Africa is now the testing ground for this theory. In Sierra
Leone, it has won the war for the government against the Revolutionary
Front, demanding in return a full franchise on Sierra Leone's
diamonds--leading to suspicions that EO is a front for the DeBeers
diamond cartel. In Uganda, EO's liaison, according to {Le Figaro,} is
the half-brother of President Museveni, Salem Saleh. Branch Energy,
one of the EO branches, is active in Uganda, and has hived off 25% of
its shares there to Salim Saleh directly, and another 45% to Saleh's
Saracen Uganda. The latter is suspected of contributing to financing
both the Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front and John Garang's Sudanese
People's Liberation Army. In addition, EO personnel guard the Karamoja
gold mines in northeastern Uganda, which are believed to be jointly
owned by Museveni and the family of Baroness Lynda Chalker.
Executive Outcomes' presence in Uganda shows that it is key to
the mercenary war waged by entities such as Barrick Gold and Anglo
American Corp., to seize the mineral-laden eastern Zaire and the gold-
and oil-rich south of Sudan. They are to be appropriated as private
holdings, in the same way that Belgium's King Leopold ran the Congo as
a personal (slave labor) estate for 80 years. EO is the vanguard of
the British monarchy's recolonization of Africa--an operation that has
already cost hundreds of thousands of African lives in the last five
years, and promises to cost millions more.
 ========================================
================
Way to go Wadie boy. Tech 'em uppities!

And for an encore, let's kill lotsa Seereeianz. Friggin' sandniggaz
ragheaded camel ridden lot I say!

http://www.libertyforum.org/showfla...sb=5&o=21&part=


Yer welcome..

In article <i26t401t8rcbvct9mr71q3udr06p2e8p1g@4ax.com>,
berlutte@sympatico.ca wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 16:44:08 -0800, The World Wide Wade
> <waderameyxiii@comcast.remove13.net> wrote:
> 
>
> 7,256,200 - 6,735,000 = 521,000
>
> Monies are coming so fast they can't keep count.

Doomer arithmetic: The sum of all contributions is less than the sum of
some contributions. There isn't a bald-faced contradiction a doomer can't
get comfortable with if he's in the mood.
 
>
> Care to post a link, polly-o?

Just go the FEC website, assuming you can point and click, and take a look.
You'll find nothing like the weird figures your messiah is tossing around.

> By the by, here's what happened under Bush 41 watch:
> http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/exonappendix1.htm
>
> Appaling to know that you're coming out from under the same rock,
> creepy-crawly thang.
>
> Signatures of brave men who didn't stand for that legal circus:
> http://larouchein2004.net/exoneration/signat1.htm
>
> Shame on you!

Who gives a shit about this or any other ravings a lunatic might post at
his web site?