Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups."JerryMouse" <nospam@bisusa.com> wrote in message news:obKdnZ4-bN3U6dvdRVn-jw@giganews.com... > Hey, I'm easy. > > How would you add a record to an ISAM file such that when the file is later > read sequentially the latest date is the first record returned? You do not read indexed files sequentially. You can read them in key order if you want; you can even use ACCESS DYNAMIC to allow the use of the START and READ NEXT verbs to read in key order starting somewhere other than at the beginning. But as far as adding records so that when you do choose to read in key order they come out in the order you want? That has nothing to do with file access per se; that is totally a function of the way you build the key and/or the way the ISAM manager allows you to define those keys. MCM
Post Follow-up to this messageMichael Mattias wrote: > "JerryMouse" <nospam@bisusa.com> wrote in message > news:obKdnZ4-bN3U6dvdRVn-jw@giganews.com... > > You do not read indexed files sequentially. You can read them in key > order if you want; you can even use ACCESS DYNAMIC to allow the use > of the START and READ NEXT verbs to read in key order starting > somewhere other than at the beginning. Thanks for the update. I've erased all instances of ACCESS IS SEQUENTIAL in my COBOL manuals where it appears in conjunction with ISAM files.
Post Follow-up to this messageXref: kermit comp.lang.cobol:85798 In article <xYF1c.30290$PY.10697@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>, Michael Mattias <michael.mattias@gte.net> wrote: >"JerryMouse" <nospam@bisusa.com> wrote in message >news:obKdnZ4-bN3U6dvdRVn-jw@giganews.com... > >You do not read indexed files sequentially. You can read them in key order >if you want; you can even use ACCESS DYNAMIC to allow the use of the START >and READ NEXT verbs to read in key order starting somewhere other than at >the beginning. This is confusing, Mr Mattias... how are you making 'in key order' to be something other than 'in key order sequence'? DD
Post Follow-up to this messageI've clearly caused some confusion here.
It "appears" the OP thought the "sequence order" and/or "PHYSICAL
construction" of the keys associated with a key-sequenced ("isam") file are
under the direct control of the COBOL language.
Of course, COBOL of and by itself has nothing to to with these things: COBOL
deals only with the LOGICAL construction of keys and order of retrieval.
Probably just should have said that the first time....
MCM
<docdwarf@panix.com> wrote in message news:c27cjf$rp3$1@panix5.panix.com...
> In article <xYF1c.30290$PY.10697@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>,
> Michael Mattias <michael.mattias@gte.net> wrote:
later
order
START
>
> This is confusing, Mr Mattias... how are you making 'in key order' to be
> something other than 'in key order sequence'?
>
> DD
>
Post Follow-up to this message"JerryMouse" <nospam@bisusa.com> wrote > Michael Mattias wrote: > > Thanks for the update. > > I've erased all instances of > > ACCESS IS SEQUENTIAL > > in my COBOL manuals where it appears in conjunction with ISAM files. You should ignore that comment from MM. ACCESS SEQUENTIAL and READ .. AT END .. gives identical results to ACCESS DYNAMIC and READ ... NEXT RECORD AT END .. Both of these give the records in key sequence order, and are 'reading the indexed file sequentially'. START _can_ be used on a file with ACCESS SEQUENTIAL and it does not need to be DYNAMIC for this. What DYNAMIC does is allow a RANDOM READ to be done on the file in addition to allowing the file to be read sequentially. A random read is one in which the key value in the record is set and a READ statement without NEXT or AT END is done. I always use READ .. NEXT RECORD when doing a sequential read on a file that has ACCESS DYNAMIC, it clarifies the difference. Both SEQUENTIAL and DYNAMIC are useful.
Post Follow-up to this message"JerryMouse" <nospam@bisusa.com> wrote > How would you add a record to an ISAM file such that when the file is late r > read sequentially the latest date is the first record returned? > > OPEN INPUT filename REVERSED? START ... FIRST KEY ... REVERSED READ ... PREVIOUS RECORD .. This works for the whole key size, what was actually required was parts to be ascending and other parts descending which can only be done by setting appropriate values in the key.
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.