Re: [PHP-DOC] EN-Revision comments Vs Docbook revision attributes

Hannes Magnusson escreveu:
> Hello all
>
> Was there any specific reason why this "EN-Revision" comment magic was
> chosen over the Docbook revision attribute?
>
> As I see it we could safe our translators _alot_ of work by manually
> bumping revision whenever the changes done in the en docs need
> re-translation.
>
> This would mean that all the WS, typo, grammar and other English
> specific bugs won't bump revision =3D> nothing for translators to fix,
> they shouldn't be forced to updated some tags.
>
>
> The only argument against it (I could find) is "more work for en doc wr=
iters".
> Heh? Right. That argument is so selfish that if anyone so much as
> mentions it I'll hunt the person down and throw snowballs at him :)
>
> Choosing when to bump revision and when not takes under 2seconds.
> Compared to the 5seconds[1] it takes _every_ translator to figure out
> if there was any real change or if he just needs to bump his
> EN-Revision (another few seconds)...
>
> This will also allow us to more accurately determine if a translation
> is really out of date or not.
>
>
> What do you guys think?
>
>
> [1] Locating and opening the commit. Read the commit message and then
> review the commit... hmm. That is probably more than 5secs..
>
> -Hannes
>
>  =20
As an translator, a big +1 for this.

Fernando Correa da Concei=E7=E3o.

On Aug 18, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Fernando Correa da Concei=E7=E3o wrote:

> Hannes Magnusson escreveu: 
 

If there's a better way then let's do it... please propose exactly =20
how it'd work and what it would look like. We'd also need to adjust =20
all the translation scripts within docweb (and scripts/) before/while =20=

implementing.

Regards,
Philip