Re: Hard Copy reports

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:01:58 -0700, "klshafer@att.net"
<klshafer@att.net> wrote:

>Agreed, for civil liability anyway. I do remember having the feeling
>that my requiring a signature established some due diligence on my
>part which, perhaps naively, I believed would offer me some defense in
>any criminal liability, however. The numbers were such that I was
>really being overly cautious anyway.


I notice the sign in the locker room saying "Not Responsible for Lost
or Stolen Items".    I take this to mean primarily "Please do not sue
us".   While their legal protection is probably a little more, their
biggest protection is in persuading us to be a bit more responsible.