(OT) ET's computing language

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/

'First of all, you wouldn't open up their hardware to find a CPU here, a=
nd  =

a data bus there, and some kind of memory over there. Their hardware  =

appeared to be perfectly solid and consistent in terms of material from =
=

one side to the other. Like a rock or a hunk of metal. But upon [much]  =

closer inspection, we began to learn that it was actually one big  =

holographic computational substrate - each "computational element"  =

(essentially individual particles) can function independently, but are  =

designed to function together in tremendously large clusters. I say its =
=

holographic because you can divide it up into the smallest chunks you wa=
nt  =

and still find a scaled-down but complete representation of the whole  =

system. They produce a nonlinear computational output when grouped. So 4=
=

elements working together is actually more than 4 times more powerful th=
an  =

1. Most of the internal "matter" in their crafts (usually everything but=
=

the outermost housing) is actually this substrate and can contribute to =
=

computation at any time and in any state. The shape of these "chunks" of=
=

substrate also had a profound effect on its functionality, and often  =

served as a "shortcut" to achieve a goal that might otherwise be more  =

complex.

So back to the language. The language is actually a "functional  =

blueprint". The forms of the shapes, symbols and arrangements thereof is=
=

itself functional. What makes it all especially difficult to grasp is th=
at  =

every element of each "diagram" is dependant on and related to every oth=
er  =

element, which means no single detail can be created, removed or modifie=
d  =

independently. Humans like written language because each element of the =
=

language can be understood on its own, and from this, complex expression=
s  =

can be built. However, their "language" is entirely context-sensitive,  =

which means that a given symbol could mean as little as a 1-bit flag in =
=

one context, or, quite literally, contain the entire human genome or a  =

galaxy star map in another. The ability for a single, small symbol to  =

contain, not just represent, tremendous amounts of data is another  =

counter-intuitive aspect of this concept. We quickly realized that even =
=

working in groups of 10 or more on the simplest of diagrams, we found it=
=

virtually impossible to get anything done. As each new feature was added=
,  =

the complexity of the diagram exponentially grew to unmanageable  =

proportions. For this reason we began to develop computer-based systems =
to  =

manage these details and achieved some success, although again we found =
=

that a threshold was quickly reached beyond which even the supercomputer=
s  =

of the day were unable to keep up. Word was that the extra-terrestrials =
=

could design these diagrams as quickly and easily as a programmer like  =

DocDwarf could write a Cobol program. It's humbling to think that even a=
=

network of supercomputers wasn't able to duplicate what they could do in=
=

their own heads. Our entire system of language is based on the idea of  =

assigning meaning to symbols. Their technology, however, somehow merges =
=

the symbol and the meaning, so a subjective audience is not needed. You =
=

can put whatever meaning you want on the symbols, but their behavior and=
=

functionality will not change, any more than a transistor will function =
=

differently if you give it another name.'
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D

Amazing nay?

jb







-- =

Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

On 2 Jul, 04:27, JB <hong...@videotron.ca> wrote:
> http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/
>
> 'First of all, you wouldn't open up their hardware to find a CPU here, an=
d =20
> a data bus there, and some kind of memory over there. Their hardware =20
> appeared to be perfectly solid and consistent in terms of material from =2
0
> one side to the other. Like a rock or a hunk of metal. But upon [much] =20
> closer inspection, we began to learn that it was actually one big =20
> holographic computational substrate - each "computational element" =20
> (essentially individual particles) can function independently, but are =20
> designed to function together in tremendously large clusters. I say its =2
0
> holographic because you can divide it up into the smallest chunks you wan=
t =20
> and still find a scaled-down but complete representation of the whole =20
> system.

Somebody has been reading too much science fiction. A better word to
use would have been fractal, not holographic.

> They produce a nonlinear computational output when grouped. So 4 =20
> elements working together is actually more than 4 times more powerful tha=
n =20
> 1.

I wonder how they overcame the need to control each device in relation
to the others. Four multicores on a chip does not produce four times
the output that one core does (because of the need to control the
cores).

> Most of the internal "matter" in their crafts (usually everything but =20
> the outermost housing) is actually this substrate and can contribute to =2
0
> computation at any time and in any state.

Perhaps Nasa should change it's design philosophy for future space
vehicles and make all spacecraft from recycled pcb boards.

> The shape of these "chunks" of =20
> substrate also had a profound effect on its functionality, and often =20
> served as a "shortcut" to achieve a goal that might otherwise be more =20
> complex.
>
> So back to the language. The language is actually a "functional =20
> blueprint". The forms of the shapes, symbols and arrangements thereof is =
20
> itself functional.

Sounds like ADA. So Cobol is dead after all.

> What makes it all especially difficult to grasp is that =20
> every element of each "diagram" is dependant on and related to every othe=
r =20
> element, which means no single detail can be created, removed or modified=
=20
> independently. Humans like written language because each element of the =2
0
> language can be understood on its own, and from this, complex expressions=
=20
> can be built. However, their "language" is entirely context-sensitive,

The word "Bollocks" is also context sensitive. You can take that any
way that you wish.
=20
> which means that a given symbol could mean as little as a 1-bit flag in =2
0
> one context, or, quite literally, contain the entire human genome or a =20
> galaxy star map in another.

Data compression that Winzip would be proud of.

> The ability for a single, small symbol to =20
> contain, not just represent, tremendous amounts of data is another =20
> counter-intuitive aspect of this concept. We quickly realized that even =2
0
> working in groups of 10 or more on the simplest of diagrams, we found it =
20
> virtually impossible to get anything done. As each new feature was added,=
=20
> the complexity of the diagram exponentially grew to unmanageable =20
> proportions. For this reason we began to develop computer-based systems t=
o =20
> manage these details and achieved some success, although again we found =2
0
> that a threshold was quickly reached beyond which even the supercomputers=
=20
> of the day were unable to keep up. Word was that the extra-terrestrials =2
0
> could design these diagrams as quickly and easily as a programmer like =20
> DocDwarf could write a Cobol program.

Some of us have long suspected that DD was an alien.

> It's humbling to think that even a =20
> network of supercomputers wasn't able to duplicate what they could do in =
20
> their own heads. Our entire system of language is based on the idea of =20
> assigning meaning to symbols. Their technology, however, somehow merges =2
0
> the symbol and the meaning, so a subjective audience is not needed. You =2
0
> can put whatever meaning you want on the symbols, but their behavior and =
20
> functionality will not change, any more than a transistor will function =2
0
> differently if you give it another name.'
>  =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=AD=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
>
> Amazing nay?
>
> jb
>

Clearly a load of twaddle but amusing reading none-the-less.

Hilary Swank changing her dirty panties!

http://www.starpapertube.com/player.asp?watch=148803



funny soccer video free funny and crazy video funny halo 2 video exclusive funny video watch funny ass video
http://635-funny-video.info/funny-site-video.html http://635-funny-video.info/clip-ebony-funny-video.html [ur
l]http://635-funny-video.info/funny-baby-video.html[/url] http://635-funny-video.info/free-fu...o-to-watch.html http://635-funny-video.info/baby-funny-video.html

Paula Abdul changing her dirty panties!
http://www.shockingonline.com/player.php?watch=726648

Heather Locklear Cheerleader Movies!
http://www.shockingonline.com/watch?movie=726648

Jessica Alba Banged & Cum Swallowing!
http://www.shockingonline.com/Windo...r.wmv?id=726648

Carmen Electra With Big Tits Masturbating!
http://www.shockingonline.com/Player.wmv?q=726648

Jennifer Aniston , tokyo japanese handjob!
http://www.shockingonline.com/a?watch=726648

scary movie 4 download movie starscream transformer adult free movie trailer cheap money clip jesus music video
80 ipod video bald britney gone spear clip free liz sex vicious michael jackson brother usher confession part 2
porn anal gratis video adult movie matrix gratis sex movie adult daily free movie muscle gay video clip
free long sex video clip video porn de teen sexy movie preview mad
onna tour kelly br
ook free movie sexy

sexy i
mage britney spears
free black woman 
porn video
video porn de ma
duras gratis
teen porn free v
ideo trailer
movie flat
angelina joli
e gia picture
trailer park
 boy movie on dvd
free link movie porn 
xxx
tgp shemale movie
free hollywood mov
ie online
http://www.exit412.net/boards/viewtopic.php?p=34855
http://www.ediety.cz/diskuze/viewtopic.php?p=25347