MI5 Persecution: Question and Answer 27/9/95 (2070)

MI5 Persecution: Question and Answer 27/9/95 (2070)
In article <DFGxnF.Cr8.0.bloor@torfree.net>
bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes:
 

When, where and by whom ?  Let's have some details
that can be checked.

I'm not going to repeat them. They're hurtful to me because they contained a
buse that was
directed against me by someone else at the time and which got picked up and 
thrown again
in the trial. It is a matter of record but I won't repeat it here.
 
 

Why would "they" wish to assassinate your character?

Well, let's put it this way - just because this is the first time it's happe
ned in this way,
from these people, on this scale, doesn't mean that it hasn't happened befor
e, on a lesser
scale. At university there were people who quite overtly hated me and would 
have wished
something nasty to happen to me. Because of where I went making the wrong so
rt of enemies
is pretty deadly.

"They" would wish to assassinate my character because it had all been done b
efore, and
because they knew I would not be able to react in any other way than I'd rea
cted previously.
 

Please give details of when, where and by whom these
comments were made, so that they can be checked.

This was four, five years ago... sorry, I don't remember. I can remember ind
ividual incidents,
words which were repeated by different people at different times in differen
t locations.

Around the end of 1992 Private Eye rtan a front-cover with John and Norma Ma
jor, with
the title "Major's support lowest ever" and John saying to Norma "Come back 
norma" on the
front cover. What can you read in to that? Not a lot, seems like standard fa
re for PE.
The first time I saw it I was in the pub with some people from work. One was
 expressing doubts
to the other (let's call the first one Simon, shall we? and the second one P
hil?) about
whether what was going on was right. Phil's answer was that if Private Eye w
as doing it
then it must be ok, "they're usually right".

A few days later, again near work, there were some students laughing in the 
street,
"Were you COMING BACK later? But I thought you said you were COMING BACK ha 
ha ha?"
Play on words, you see. Not very nice, either. I had start medication soon a
fterwards.
Clever people, these chaps who think up PE titles. Just slightly lacking in 
any
sense of morality.
 

What was the date of the broadcast ?
Out of 2 million plus listeners, why should you be
the only one that Tarrant was allegedly referring to ?

Sometyime in spring 1994. I can't remember the date, I heard the broadcast i
n the
car - I was going into the office from London that day and just happened to 
snap
on the radio, and hey presto! Mr Tarrant gives us the benefit of his excelle
nt
understanding.

 

What was the name of the detective agency and their
address ?

I don't see why I should tell you that, but they're in Yellow Pages; they're
a well-established outfit.
 

Is there a deep dark secret in your past ?

Apart from "it's all happened before in a different way", no.
 
 

Is your name truly Mike Corley, or are you using it as
an alias ?

It's an alias. I'm not English by ethnic origin. If someone manages to prono
unce
my name as well as that guy did then they must have been really trying.
 

Have you appeared, or been reported by name on TV ?
When, where and by whom ?

No. Never. Not directly.
 

What was the name of the coach company and your date
of departure ?

It was a national express coach. At dover we boarded a ferry for Holland som
ewhere.
The company that organized the trip went out of business some time ago, so t
hey won't
have records of passengers - so we can't get any corroboration from anyone e
lse
that way. We tried all that last summer, ran into a brick wall.

The other thing is in summer 1992 I was visibly ill, so other people in the
party might remember that more than anyone getting at me on the coach trip.
 

Why were you being painted as a "threat"; is this related
to a "deep,dark, secret" ?

Aaaarrrrgh. I think I should make clear that that's their created justificat
ion
rather than the real reason. They started harassing first and then came up w
ith the
reasons for it.
 

Who ?

Someone who knew me some time ago. Someone who would have been able to talk 
this
little campaign into existence.
 

Is this true ?  What is the medication and dosage ?

Yes, I'm afraid so. Sulpiride, 200mg a day. It's designed to stop people
coming up with the sort of ideas you've heard here for the last few ws.
Give him a higher dose!!

In the long term it causes tardive dyskinesia, tardive dementia and general
nasty stuff to your brain. So it's three years of sulpiride talking to you h
ere.

>--
>john heelan

2070
Post Follow-up to this message
MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk
06-08-07 11:55 PM