Code Comments

Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.
For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines | New: Database administration forum
Registration is free! Edit your profileCalendarFind other membersFrequently Asked QuestionsSearch -> 
Post New Thread











Thread
Author

The Lambda lambada...Why embedded SQL is becoming irrelevant and why you should start looking at fun
Many people working in COBOL on both mainframe and Client/Server systems
deal with queries against relational data every day.

Over the years we have become adept with it and can usually get it to do
whatever we want. Most of us are satisfied we have this particular base
covered.

But, there are severe limitations in the "imperative programming" approach
as implemented by COBOL and other languages where we embed SQL.

If you are interested in where SQL is going, WHY the current approaches will
not be suitable for emerging architecture, and getting some straightforward
conceptual information from the horse's mouth, you may find this video
interview of interest..

http://wm.microsoft.com/ms/msdn/vis...Anders_0001.wmv


Functional programming represents the extension of the OO paradigm into the
next dimension. The interview with Anders Hejlstrom (who invented C#, among
other impressive credentials) is in plain English, and most programmers from
any background will be able to follow it.

(If you at least understand OO terminology it is helpful, but not essential.
There are a number of references to "IL"; this is "Intermediate Language"
and, for the purposes of this discussion, can be considered as you would
"machine code")

I have stopped using the "embedded SQL" approach with cursors and seqential
processing for some months now (mainly since I moved to C#, where the
alternatives are preferred and actually easier to implement...) and operate
instead on datasets, result sets, data and table adapters. I did this
originally because it meant less connect time and allowed connections to
databases to be shared and pooled in a much better way. (Also, queries
operate much better when they are directed at in-memory objects than when
they are directed at external disk files). After viewing the above interview
a couple of times I am now understanding why it is important to break away
from embedded SQL.

This is NOT the end of SQL!! (If you haven't already, start learning it...
:-)) It is the end of "embedded SQL" as we currently understand it...

Data that can be in any format, from any source, is what the future "SQL"
must deal with, and it must be capable of dealing with it concurrently
across multiple cores.

Can it be done?  Hejlstrom thinks it can.

I'd be interested to hear what people here think.

Pete.




Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Pete Dashwood
03-14-07 02:55 AM


Sponsored Links




Last Thread Next Thread Next
Search this forum -> 
Post New Thread

Cobol archive

Show a Printable Version Send to friend Email This Page to Someone! subscribe to this thread Receive updates to this thread
Computer Consultants
Programming Jobs
Visual Basic Controls
SQL Server Programming
Webservices
Java Security
Visual Studio
C# Programming
Visual J++
Software engineering
Open source Software
Perl Programming
PHP Programming
ASP Programming
ASP .NET Programming
Visual Basic Programming
Windows Scripting Host
Java Programming
Java Help
Java Beans
VBScript
Cobol
MAC Applications
Unix Programming
Forum Jump:
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:13 AM.

 
Free MCSE Braindumps | Real Estate Topics

Programming forum archive

Copyrights CodeComments.com 2004 - 2006

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.