Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?

docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
> In article <12m128anscmdo31@news.supernews.com>,
> HeyBub <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Quite the sociologist, I've heard... do tell, where and when did he do his
> field studies?  Was there a particular methodolgy applied... or did he
> just sit in a house-trailer and write Tall Tales?  When an opinion is
> bolstered by 'something I read in a novel' it might do well to give it as
> much weight as an opinion bolstered by 'something I saw in a movie'.
>
> DD

Doc, you should know better than to use the term METHODOLOGY (the study
of methods) when you obviously mean METHOD.

In article <1164045771.648687.236880@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Alistair <alistair@ld50macca.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>docdwarf@panix.com wrote: 
>
>Doc, you should know better than to use the term METHODOLOGY (the study
>of methods) when you obviously mean METHOD.

Mr Maclean, I intended to inquire into the body of methods, rules and
postulates employed by the sociologist in question; that is, by at least
one definition (http://m-w.com/dictionary/methodology) a methodology.

DD