Code Comments
Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.In the 2002 standard, these are documented as "will be deleted in the next revision". see. 6.3.4 and G.2. However, exactly the same text appears verbatim everywhere regarding debugging indicator/lines in the 2008 standard. Oversight or deliberate ?
Post Follow-up to this messageRoger, Are you looking at the current draft, i.e. "ISO/IEC 1989:200x WD 1.6 (E)" The only place I see references to "debugging" in that is in the section describing what has been removed. -- Bill Klein wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com "Roger While" <simrw@sim-basis.de> wrote in message news:eb9cg3$ne3$01$1@news.t-online.com... > In the 2002 standard, these are documented as > "will be deleted in the next revision". see. 6.3.4 and G.2. > > However, exactly the same text appears verbatim everywhere > regarding debugging indicator/lines in the 2008 standard. > > Oversight or deliberate ? > >
Post Follow-up to this messageWell, I thought I was :-) Obviously not. Roger "William M. Klein" <wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:EG7Cg.337217$Zr.40166@fe06.news.easynews.com... > Roger, > Are you looking at the current draft, i.e. > > "ISO/IEC 1989:200x WD 1.6 (E)" > > The only place I see references to "debugging" in that is in the section > describing what has been removed. > > -- > Bill Klein > wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com > "Roger While" <simrw@sim-basis.de> wrote in message > news:eb9cg3$ne3$01$1@news.t-online.com... > >
Post Follow-up to this messagePowered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.