| Matt Sickler 2006-09-19, 7:11 pm |
| you can also use refcount_increment() - which is more work, but at least you
get to decide whether watching for a signal keeps you alive
On 19 Sep 2006 08:18:59 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Rocco> + The sig() reference count has been removed. There will be
> much rejoicing,
> Rocco> and probably some gnashing of teeth.
>
> I've not been following. Is this an even-numbered w or an odd numbered
> w? As in, if a session is waiting for a real or artificial signal is
> that
> still enough to keep it alive, or has that now gone away? If it's gone
> away,
> what's the pattern I'll need to keep it around... create an artifically
> delayed bogus event?
>
> --
> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777
> 0095
> <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
> See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl
> training!
>
|