For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Tex > December 2005 > Re: [OT] English Grammar Pitfalls









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: [OT] English Grammar Pitfalls
Ulrich M. Schwarz

2005-12-15, 4:03 am

Dan Sommers <me@privacy.net> writes:

> On 14 Dec 2005 09:45:02 -0800,
> "Dan" <luecking@uark.edu> wrote:
>
>
> And now all I can think of is an economy that is (a) crude, and (b)
> based on oil (which should have been rendered as "a crude, oil based
> economy" or "a crude, oil-based economy").


In German, this would suggest that crude and oil-based are somewhat
orthogonal to each other. If we assume for the moment the 60's SF
stance that the two major choices are oil-based (old, crude) and
fission-based (new, sophisticated), they would be the crude
oil-based economy and the sophisticated fission-based economy (since
we assume there cannot be a sophisticated oil-based economy).
Fortunately, we tend to have gianttapewormwordcompounds to avoid
that.

> Who invented this language, anyway?


Yeah, let's throw it out and build a new one. ;-)

Ulrich
(or was it the other way around? I think I've got it right.)
--
http://talcum.sarovar.org/ (Current release: 0.5.138 20050911)
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com