Home > Archive > VC STL > February 2006 > Help with locale migration to VS2005
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Help with locale migration to VS2005
|
|
| Notre Poubelle 2006-02-28, 7:07 pm |
| Hi,
I'm trying to migrate an app from VS 2003 to 2005. My code has a statement
like this:
locale loc (locale::classic(), new NoCodecvt);
where NoCodevt is defined like this:
class NoCodecvt : public codecvt<wchar_t, char, mbstate_t>
{
public:
virtual bool do_always_noconv () const {return (true);}
};
The first statement no longer compiles. The error messages are:
- error C2661: 'std::locale::facet::operator new' : no overloaded function
takes 3 arguments
- error C2664: 'std::locale::locale(const char *,std::locale::category)' :
cannot convert parameter 1 from 'const std::locale' to 'const char *'
Could anyone please advise how I could rewrite this for VS2005?
Thank you,
Notre
| |
| Igor Tandetnik 2006-02-28, 7:07 pm |
| Notre Poubelle <notre_poubelle@online.nospam> wrote:
> I'm trying to migrate an app from VS 2003 to 2005. My code has a
> statement like this:
>
> locale loc (locale::classic(), new NoCodecvt);
>
> where NoCodevt is defined like this:
>
> class NoCodecvt : public codecvt<wchar_t, char, mbstate_t>
> {
> public:
> virtual bool do_always_noconv () const {return (true);}
> };
>
> The first statement no longer compiles. The error messages are:
>
> - error C2661: 'std::locale::facet::operator new' : no overloaded
> function takes 3 arguments
Look for the following line in your code somewhere:
#define new DEBUG_NEW
MFC wizard puts it in. It messes with class-specific operator new(). It
looks like facet class now provides its own operator new.
> - error C2664: 'std::locale::locale(const char
> *,std::locale::category)' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'const
> std::locale' to 'const char *'
This error will likely disappear once you fix the first one.
--
With best wishes,
Igor Tandetnik
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead. -- RFC 1925
| |
| Notre Poubelle 2006-02-28, 7:07 pm |
| That did it, thanks Igor!
P.S. I like your rfc quote. I had to look it up to see whether it really
existed :)
|
|
|
|
|