For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Compression > July 2007 > Re: Adobe Audition 1.5 allows WMA monoaural audio at 44.1 KHz sample-rate with a bit-









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Adobe Audition 1.5 allows WMA monoaural audio at 44.1 KHz sample-rate with a bit-
Arny Krueger

2007-07-17, 7:55 am

"Radium" <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184652834.610528.86840@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com


> Adobe Audition 1.5 allows WMA monaural audio at 44.1 KHz
> sample-rate with a bit-rate of 20 kbps. How does it do
> this? How can the bit-rate be less than the sample-rate?


Because they are two different things.

WMA files are often compressed using lossy compression. Lossy compression is
used to vastly decrease the amount of data in the audio file.

> In a monaural WMA file that is 44.1 KHz sample rate, what
> is the minimum bit-rate that is mathematically-required?


With lossy compression, there is no strict mathematical relationship.

> Can it be compressed to 1-bit-per-second while still
> retaining the 44.1 KHz sample-rate? If so, then how? If
> not, then why?


> What version of WMA does Adobe Audition 1.5 use?


Why not ask Adobe. www.adobeforums.com

> Also, why do WMA artifacts sound different from MP3
> artifacts?


Because they are two different means for doing lossy compression.

> What is the mechanism behind WMA compression
> that gives WMA its characteristic artifacts?


WMA is a proprietary compression technique, and not a great deal is known
about its internal processing. There are people who might be able to help
you at http://www.hydrogenaudio.com/




Richard Crowley

2007-07-17, 6:55 pm

Why do people continue to feed this notorious troll?


Arny Krueger

2007-07-17, 6:55 pm

"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xp7rt.net> wrote in message
news:5g494eF3e5nghU1@mid.individual.net

> Why do people continue to feed this notorious troll?


Hope springs eternal?


Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2009 codecomments.com