Home > Archive > Compression > October 2006 > Re: 2-hour length, 148.50 Mhz, 1920 x 1080 progressive scan image, 1-bit object data,
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: 2-hour length, 148.50 Mhz, 1920 x 1080 progressive scan image, 1-bit object data,
|
|
| Bob Myers 2006-10-30, 6:55 pm |
|
"Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1162010588.862051.288370@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Frames per sec should not be decreased at all. The sample rate should
> still be 148.50 mhz.
Why are you hung up on sample rate per se? Question:
if I could decrease the sample rate by eliminating "dead"
time in the original video signal (for instance, by cutting out
excess blanking time in which no image information was
being transmitted), would you find that acceptable?
>
> Infinite, as long as as the sample-rate [148.50 mhz], the frame-rate
> [60 hz], and the pixel-resolution [1920 X 1080 progressive] are not
> decreased. As for the color-depth, compress it as much as you want.
Oh, OK - in that case, I can give you an infinitely-degraded
image in no bits at all! :-)
And why do you think that "color depth" is something
you can compress the daylights out of, but by Gawd, don't
touch there OTHER things?
Bob M.
|
|
|
|
|