Home > Archive > Compression > October 2006 > Re: 2-hour length, 148.50 Mhz, 1920 x 1080 progressive scan image, 1-bit object data,
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: 2-hour length, 148.50 Mhz, 1920 x 1080 progressive scan image, 1-bit object data,
|
|
| Quanta 2006-10-30, 6:55 pm |
|
"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:LOf0h.1674$di4.59@news.cpqcorp.net...
>
> "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:1161916205.805832.287290@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>
> Radium, old chap, here's exactly what you said:
>
> "So is it possible to exist for the following to exist:
>
> A WMV file of 2-hour length, 148.50 Mhz, 1920 x 1080 progressive scan
> image, whose object data is only 1-bit in size due to massive
> compression of color-depth? [this file would be 193 bits in size
> because the the "object size" is 64 bits, the GUID is 128 bits, and the
> object data is only 1-bit]?
>
> If such a WMV file can exist, how would its video look like?"
>
> You're clearly talking about the "object data" - i.e., all of the data
> outside of the required overhead - being just a single bit. That's
> the data that actually carries the video information, right? If not,
> then what exactly DID you mean by "the object data is only
> 1 bit"?
>
> And given THAT, the analysis I gave you is both correct and
> relevant. You simply have no idea what you're talking about
> here - once again.
>
> Bob M.
>
>
>
>
A-men and Bravo!
|
|
|
|
|