For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Compression > November 2005 > [very OT] Re: New combinatorial coder: tighter & faster than Arithmetic coding









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author [very OT] Re: New combinatorial coder: tighter & faster than Arithmetic coding
Phil Carmody

2005-11-20, 6:55 pm

Ben Rudiak-Gould <br276deleteme@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en


I'm - what on earth is the point of such a header in
news-posting context? And why is a cantabrigian prioritising
en-us above en?!?!?

Send my regards to the L&LL,
Phil
--
If a religion is defined to be a system of ideas that contains unprovable
statements, then Godel taught us that mathematics is not only a religion, it
is the only religion that can prove itself to be one. -- John Barrow
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com