|
|
| SmartiKat 2004-06-06, 3:56 pm |
| Wow, someone just put Access 2.0 on MSDN Subscriber download...
Must be a slow month... I wonder what's going to be put up next... Word
2.0??? Windows 2.x??? I know, I know... How about Microsoft BOB???
(Yes, I got up the wrong side the bed this morning.)
| |
| Schooner 2004-06-06, 8:55 pm |
| I would suspect it is because they can now list it again with the Java
settlement and push out of the JVM support.
A lot of people require it to support older clients so it is well wanted.
"SmartiKat" <akw@___smartikat.com> wrote in message
news:%23xX7nn$SEHA.808@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Wow, someone just put Access 2.0 on MSDN Subscriber download...
>
> Must be a slow month... I wonder what's going to be put up next... Word
> 2.0??? Windows 2.x??? I know, I know... How about Microsoft BOB???
>
> (Yes, I got up the wrong side the bed this morning.)
>
>
| |
| Ronny Ong 2004-06-07, 3:56 am |
| "SmartiKat" <akw@___smartikat.com> wrote in message
news:%23xX7nn$SEHA.808@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> 2.0??? Windows 2.x??? I know, I know... How about Microsoft BOB???
You should have been watching the RSS feed for Subscribers Downloads on
April 1...
| |
| Ronny Ong 2004-06-07, 3:56 am |
| Access 2.0 was a 16-bit product. It shipped prior to the release of
Microsoft's JVM. In fact, it shipped more than a year before Internet
Explorer 1.0. There was never any Java issue with Access 2.0.
"Schooner" <schooner@accesswave.ca> wrote in message
news:u6Mwc.2014$vO1.17065@nnrp1.uunet.ca...[color=darkred]
>I would suspect it is because they can now list it again with the Java
> settlement and push out of the JVM support.
> A lot of people require it to support older clients so it is well wanted.
>
> "SmartiKat" <akw@___smartikat.com> wrote in message
> news:%23xX7nn$SEHA.808@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| |
| Schooner 2004-06-07, 8:56 am |
| Ah sorry, thought it contained it as well. Perhaps I was thinking of Access
97.
"Ronny Ong" <ronnyong@killspam-bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:e1FjAjETEHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Access 2.0 was a 16-bit product. It shipped prior to the release of
> Microsoft's JVM. In fact, it shipped more than a year before Internet
> Explorer 1.0. There was never any Java issue with Access 2.0.
>
>
> "Schooner" <schooner@accesswave.ca> wrote in message
> news:u6Mwc.2014$vO1.17065@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
wanted.[color=darkred]
>
>
>
| |
| Andy Boyd [MS] 2004-06-10, 3:56 pm |
| I see that someone got my little joke.
--
Andy Boyd
Program Manager
MSDN Subscriber Downloads
"Ronny Ong" <ronnyong@killspam-bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:e6jKZjETEHA.3140@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> "SmartiKat" <akw@___smartikat.com> wrote in message
> news:%23xX7nn$SEHA.808@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
>
> You should have been watching the RSS feed for Subscribers Downloads on
> April 1...
>
|
|
|
|