|
|
|
| Is there somebody who can prove ASP.NET is faster than ASP ( need to
quantify - how fast it is )
Thank you.
Regards,
Raj.
| |
| Bob Barrows [MVP] 2007-05-30, 6:56 pm |
| Raj wrote:
> Is there somebody who can prove ASP.NET is faster than ASP ( need to
> quantify - how fast it is )
>
Probably not.
I am not aware of any published comparisons and frankly, you could do
your own comparison in your own environment using your own application
code. In other words, even if there are published results, they are
unlikely to be relevant to your situation.
Intuitively, compiled dll's are very likely to be much faster than
interpreted vbscript code ... at _some_tasks ...
As a famous author once said: VB waits just as fast as C++
--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
| |
|
| Bob Barrows [MVP] wrote:
> Raj wrote:
> Probably not.
> I am not aware of any published comparisons and frankly, you could do
> your own comparison in your own environment using your own application
> code. In other words, even if there are published results, they are
> unlikely to be relevant to your situation.
>
> Intuitively, compiled dll's are very likely to be much faster than
> interpreted vbscript code ... at _some_tasks ...
> As a famous author once said: VB waits just as fast as C++
Does my Firefox load aspx files faster than asp files? Hell no.
terje
| |
| Dave Anderson 2007-05-30, 6:56 pm |
| Terje wrote:
> Does my Firefox load aspx files faster than asp files? Hell no.
And what does the client have to do with server performance? The question is
about performance on the server.
--
Dave Anderson
Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms.
| |
|
| Dave Anderson wrote:
> Terje wrote:
>
> And what does the client have to do with server performance? The question is
> about performance on the server.
Well, maybe the client would notice the difference, if there was one.
terje
| |
| Jon Paal [MSMD] 2007-05-30, 6:56 pm |
| google this
ASP.NET vs ASP classic performance
"Raj" <raj@track-mate.net> wrote in message news:%23r8Kp6qoHHA.3772@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Is there somebody who can prove ASP.NET is faster than ASP ( need to quantify - how fast it is )
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Raj.
>
| |
| Dave Anderson 2007-05-31, 3:56 am |
| "Terje" wrote:
>
> Well, maybe the client would notice the difference, if there was one.
The question should reasonably be understod to ask which technology is more
efficient at processing the same requests and producing the exact same
output. Clients have NOTHING to do with this question.
--
Dave Anderson
Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms.
| |
| GeorgeScott 2007-06-14, 6:56 pm |
| I believe the real answer here is the code written efficient. You can
write slow code in ASP or ASP.Net the better you are the language the
faster your code will be.
For the original poster, even though ASP.Net is complex, if you want
to make a great deal of money go ahead and try to learn it because
people will pay for it, while it is hard to get people excited about
Asp 3.0 because not going to be updated any longer. Asp 3.0 is much
easier but no one really cares, they just end product and be able to
say it on the "lastest greatest" technology.
|
|
|
|