For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Unix Programming > December 2004 > File * to fd









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author File * to fd
Kamal R. Prasad

2004-12-25, 3:56 am

From: Kenny McCormack (gazelle@yin.interaccess.com)
Subject: Re: File * to fd

View this article only
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Date: 2004-12-24 10:19:37 PST

In article <41cc401d$0$6214$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@Sun.COM> wrote:
>kamalp@acm.org (Kamal R. Pra) writes:
>
stupid[color=darkred]
POSIX[color=darkred]
might[color=darkred]
>
>Surely there must be some programmer's proverb like "penny wise,
>pound foolish" (cycle savvy, maintenance hazard?)
>
>You should *never* circumvent a standard interface because you
>think it's faster; apart from the fact that performance and intuition
>don't go well together and that people generally optimize the bits
>which are not performance critical, you also increase you maintenance
>and portability issues.


This does nothing to address the fact that POSIX cares a lot about
portability -but not about how thick the wrappers are. Just to let you
know that portability is less of an issue at the sytem level than at
the application level.

>That is usually the goal.


>Don't want to be out-sourced, do ya?


Can we leave politics out of this plz?

thanks
-kamal
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com